La sedación paliativa acorta la vida de los pacientes

María de la Luz Casas-Martínez, I. Mora-Magaña
{"title":"La sedación paliativa acorta la vida de los pacientes","authors":"María de la Luz Casas-Martínez, I. Mora-Magaña","doi":"10.5294/PEBI.2017.21.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respect for human life is central to medicine. In terminal patients, refractory symptoms are a niche of palliative sedation. This paper identi es, based on scienti c evidence, the survival in patients who received palliative sedation as compared to those who didn’t. We conducted a search for systematic reviews from 2000 to 2016, which were methodologically analyzed, and the results were then compared. For methodological reasons, meta-analysis could not be performed. It is concluded that terminal palliative sedation does not shorten patients’ lives. The implementation of the principle of double effect related to the possible shortening of life was reformulated; the unwanted evil is the loss of consciousness.","PeriodicalId":31213,"journal":{"name":"Persona y Bioetica","volume":"21 1","pages":"204-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Persona y Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5294/PEBI.2017.21.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Respect for human life is central to medicine. In terminal patients, refractory symptoms are a niche of palliative sedation. This paper identi es, based on scienti c evidence, the survival in patients who received palliative sedation as compared to those who didn’t. We conducted a search for systematic reviews from 2000 to 2016, which were methodologically analyzed, and the results were then compared. For methodological reasons, meta-analysis could not be performed. It is concluded that terminal palliative sedation does not shorten patients’ lives. The implementation of the principle of double effect related to the possible shortening of life was reformulated; the unwanted evil is the loss of consciousness.
姑息性镇静缩短病人的生命
尊重人的生命是医学的核心。在晚期患者中,顽固性症状是姑息性镇静的一个利基。根据科学证据,本文确定了接受姑息性镇静的患者与未接受姑息性镇静的患者的生存率。我们检索了2000年至2016年的系统综述,对其进行了方法学分析,并对结果进行了比较。由于方法学原因,不能进行meta分析。结论晚期姑息性镇静不会缩短患者的生命。重新制定了与可能缩短寿命有关的双重作用原理的实施;不想要的邪恶是失去意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书