Methods for the extraction of microplastics in complex solid, water and biota samples

IF 11.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Silvia S. Monteiro, João Pinto da Costa
{"title":"Methods for the extraction of microplastics in complex solid, water and biota samples","authors":"Silvia S. Monteiro,&nbsp;João Pinto da Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2021.e00151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The widespread distribution of plastics, their persistence and ability to act as a vector of toxic chemicals has rendered them concerning emergent pollutants. The quantification of these contaminants is highly relevant for the evaluation of anthropogenic impacts on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and dependent of the efficacy of methods to separate microplastics from environmental matrices. Little information is available about the microplastic extraction methods on complex samples – i.e. samples with multiple types of matrices. Herein, methods for the separation of microplastics from complex samples are summarized and discussed based on their advantages and drawbacks focused on a comparative analysis of their efficiency on organic matter removal, polymer recovery and preservation of plastic integrity. The efficiency on microplastic recovery and organic matter reduction, as well as the examination of the effects of treatments on plastics are closely linked to the density and digestion approaches selected, the polymer features and the environmental matrix analyzed. High-density salt solutions are more effective for density separation, while oxidative methods have recurrently shown better rates of organic matter reduction (particularly in vegetal-rich samples) and plastic recovery, with little impact on plastics, while 10 % KOH has been described as highly efficient in samples containing animal organic matter. This comparative analysis highlights the benefits and limitations of different approaches for the analysis of microplastics in complex samples which may be helpful for the optimization and harmonization of the methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158821000386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The widespread distribution of plastics, their persistence and ability to act as a vector of toxic chemicals has rendered them concerning emergent pollutants. The quantification of these contaminants is highly relevant for the evaluation of anthropogenic impacts on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and dependent of the efficacy of methods to separate microplastics from environmental matrices. Little information is available about the microplastic extraction methods on complex samples – i.e. samples with multiple types of matrices. Herein, methods for the separation of microplastics from complex samples are summarized and discussed based on their advantages and drawbacks focused on a comparative analysis of their efficiency on organic matter removal, polymer recovery and preservation of plastic integrity. The efficiency on microplastic recovery and organic matter reduction, as well as the examination of the effects of treatments on plastics are closely linked to the density and digestion approaches selected, the polymer features and the environmental matrix analyzed. High-density salt solutions are more effective for density separation, while oxidative methods have recurrently shown better rates of organic matter reduction (particularly in vegetal-rich samples) and plastic recovery, with little impact on plastics, while 10 % KOH has been described as highly efficient in samples containing animal organic matter. This comparative analysis highlights the benefits and limitations of different approaches for the analysis of microplastics in complex samples which may be helpful for the optimization and harmonization of the methods.

复杂固体、水和生物群样品中微塑料的提取方法
塑料的广泛分布,它们的持久性和作为有毒化学物质载体的能力使它们成为紧急污染物。这些污染物的量化与评估人为对水生和陆地生态系统的影响高度相关,并取决于从环境基质中分离微塑料的方法的有效性。关于复杂样品(即具有多种类型基质的样品)的微塑性提取方法的信息很少。本文总结和讨论了从复杂样品中分离微塑料的各种方法的优缺点,重点比较分析了它们在有机物去除、聚合物回收和保持塑料完整性方面的效率。微塑料回收和有机物减少的效率以及处理对塑料的影响的研究与所选择的密度和消化方法、聚合物特性和所分析的环境基质密切相关。高密度盐溶液对密度分离更有效,而氧化方法反复显示出有机物还原(特别是在富含植物的样品中)和塑料回收的更好速率,对塑料几乎没有影响,而10%的KOH已被描述为含有动物有机物的样品的高效。这一比较分析突出了不同方法对复杂样品中微塑料分析的优点和局限性,这可能有助于方法的优化和协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信