Outcomes en la evaluación de las relaciones públicas, la aproximación semiótica / Outcomes in the evaluation of public relations, the semiotic approach

IF 0.1 Q4 COMMUNICATION
López del Castillo Wilderbeek, F. Leslie
{"title":"Outcomes en la evaluación de las relaciones públicas, la aproximación semiótica / Outcomes in the evaluation of public relations, the semiotic approach","authors":"López del Castillo Wilderbeek, F. Leslie","doi":"10.5783/REVRRPP.V9I18.612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"La evaluacion de las relaciones publicas es una actividad de primer orden cuyo objetivo es comprender si esta funcion ha alcanzado la efectividad pretendida. Pese a que el mundo academico ofrece modelos de evaluacion, en la actualidad el analisis de los resultados obtenidos sigue estando mas centrado en datos relacionados con la cobertura que genera las relaciones publicas olvidando la verdadera influencia que espera alcanzar. Existe un consenso generalizado sobre la importancia que tiene medir los verdaderos resultados que se extraen de las acciones de relaciones publicas. Estos datos se conocen como outcomes y resulta muy complejo encontrar ejemplos reales y concretos sobre su medicion o cuantificacion. Este articulo espera ofrecer una opcion para el estudio de outcomes basado en la combinacion de analisis del discurso y de la semiotica. Palabras clave: Relaciones publicas, outputs, outcomes, evaluacion, analisis del discurso, semiotica Abstract Evaluation of public relations is a major activity whose goal is to understand whether this function has reached the intended effectiveness. Although the academic world offers evaluation models nowadays still common to analyze results with data obtained by the coverage generated by public relations, forgetting the true influence that it hopes to reach. Authors such as MacNamara and Gregory (2018) have analyzed the evaluation models of strategic communication focusing on the final results that are the objective of the communication actions. On the other hand, institutions such as the AMEC have formulated in their frameworks the differences that exist between the coverage obtained (outputs) and the changes achieved (outcomes). Therefore there is a general consensus on the importance of measuring the true influence of public relations actions. These data are known as outcomes and it is very difficult to find real and concrete examples of their measurement or quantification. This situation is due to the fact that institutions dedicated to measuring and evaluating communication avoid explaining in detail the methods they use to assess the achievement of objectives in the actions they implement. This article hopes to offer an option for the study of outcomes through the combination of discourse analysis and semiotics. On the one hand, discourse analysis is a qualitative research method that aims to extract relevant information from a contextual perspective. On the other hand, semiotics is a discipline with a broad vision oriented to the comprehension of messages. Within this line the use of a technique known as semiotic square allows to show the tensions in the meanings related to a brand or organization. The application of the discourse analysis and the semiotic square could allow interpreting the changes in the coverage generated by the communication actions of the organizations. This would be possible by applying an observation before the exposition and another after the application of the necessary communication actions that promote the values intended by the organization. The free change of the values that are associated to an organization can be a vital element to improve its media positioning in its business. For example, Exxon implemented actions for the benefit of the environment following the rejection of its shareholders' meeting. The owners of the company criticized that the organization was being mismanaged for not taking into account the climate risk. The success of these actions is measurable both quantitatively and qualitatively by providing an outcome whose intensity can achieve shareholder acceptance. The change of meanings associated with Exxon may represent the approval of management by the real owners. In this small test the semiotic square measurement indicated the change from pro-contaminant and non-sustainable to anti-pollutant and non-sustainable values, and invites for more ambitious research. Applying a case study, this research shows the possible use of two tools not valued until now. The combination of discourse analysis and semiotic square can be a great help for the interpretation of the results generated by concrete public relations policies within the strategic communication of an organization. Keywords Public relations, outputs, outcomes, evaluation, discourse analysis, semiotics http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-18-2019-07-119-142","PeriodicalId":42959,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional de Relaciones Publicas","volume":"9 1","pages":"119-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional de Relaciones Publicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5783/REVRRPP.V9I18.612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

La evaluacion de las relaciones publicas es una actividad de primer orden cuyo objetivo es comprender si esta funcion ha alcanzado la efectividad pretendida. Pese a que el mundo academico ofrece modelos de evaluacion, en la actualidad el analisis de los resultados obtenidos sigue estando mas centrado en datos relacionados con la cobertura que genera las relaciones publicas olvidando la verdadera influencia que espera alcanzar. Existe un consenso generalizado sobre la importancia que tiene medir los verdaderos resultados que se extraen de las acciones de relaciones publicas. Estos datos se conocen como outcomes y resulta muy complejo encontrar ejemplos reales y concretos sobre su medicion o cuantificacion. Este articulo espera ofrecer una opcion para el estudio de outcomes basado en la combinacion de analisis del discurso y de la semiotica. Palabras clave: Relaciones publicas, outputs, outcomes, evaluacion, analisis del discurso, semiotica Abstract Evaluation of public relations is a major activity whose goal is to understand whether this function has reached the intended effectiveness. Although the academic world offers evaluation models nowadays still common to analyze results with data obtained by the coverage generated by public relations, forgetting the true influence that it hopes to reach. Authors such as MacNamara and Gregory (2018) have analyzed the evaluation models of strategic communication focusing on the final results that are the objective of the communication actions. On the other hand, institutions such as the AMEC have formulated in their frameworks the differences that exist between the coverage obtained (outputs) and the changes achieved (outcomes). Therefore there is a general consensus on the importance of measuring the true influence of public relations actions. These data are known as outcomes and it is very difficult to find real and concrete examples of their measurement or quantification. This situation is due to the fact that institutions dedicated to measuring and evaluating communication avoid explaining in detail the methods they use to assess the achievement of objectives in the actions they implement. This article hopes to offer an option for the study of outcomes through the combination of discourse analysis and semiotics. On the one hand, discourse analysis is a qualitative research method that aims to extract relevant information from a contextual perspective. On the other hand, semiotics is a discipline with a broad vision oriented to the comprehension of messages. Within this line the use of a technique known as semiotic square allows to show the tensions in the meanings related to a brand or organization. The application of the discourse analysis and the semiotic square could allow interpreting the changes in the coverage generated by the communication actions of the organizations. This would be possible by applying an observation before the exposition and another after the application of the necessary communication actions that promote the values intended by the organization. The free change of the values that are associated to an organization can be a vital element to improve its media positioning in its business. For example, Exxon implemented actions for the benefit of the environment following the rejection of its shareholders' meeting. The owners of the company criticized that the organization was being mismanaged for not taking into account the climate risk. The success of these actions is measurable both quantitatively and qualitatively by providing an outcome whose intensity can achieve shareholder acceptance. The change of meanings associated with Exxon may represent the approval of management by the real owners. In this small test the semiotic square measurement indicated the change from pro-contaminant and non-sustainable to anti-pollutant and non-sustainable values, and invites for more ambitious research. Applying a case study, this research shows the possible use of two tools not valued until now. The combination of discourse analysis and semiotic square can be a great help for the interpretation of the results generated by concrete public relations policies within the strategic communication of an organization. Keywords Public relations, outputs, outcomes, evaluation, discourse analysis, semiotics http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-18-2019-07-119-142
公共关系评估结果,符号学方法/公共关系评估结果,符号学方法
对公众关系的评估是一项初级或目标活动,包括对效果的评估。作为一个世界性的评估模型研究院,在对结果的实际分析中,我们发现了一个关于公共关系的中心数据,以及一个对特定人群的影响。在公共关系事件之外,存在着一个公认的普遍性的重要结果。这些数据集中在结果和结果上,这些结果和结果集中在实际情况和结论上。特别是在讨论分析和符号学相结合的基础上,对结果进行研究。Palabras clave:公共关系、产出、结果、评估、讨论分析、符号学摘要公共关系评估是一项主要活动,其目标是了解这一功能是否达到预期效果。尽管如今学术界提供的评估模型仍然很常见,用公共关系报道获得的数据来分析结果,却忘记了它希望达到的真正影响。MacNamara和Gregory(2018)等作者分析了战略沟通的评估模型,重点是沟通行动的最终结果。另一方面,AMEC等机构在其框架中阐述了所获得的覆盖范围(产出)和所实现的变化(成果)之间存在的差异。因此,对于衡量公共关系行为的真实影响的重要性,人们达成了普遍共识。这些数据被称为结果,很难找到其测量或量化的真实和具体的例子。出现这种情况的原因是,致力于衡量和评估沟通的机构避免详细解释他们在实施行动时评估目标实现情况的方法。本文希望通过语篇分析和符号学的结合,为研究结果提供一种选择。一方面,语篇分析是一种定性的研究方法,旨在从语境的角度提取相关信息。另一方面,符号学是一门具有广阔视野的学科,致力于理解信息。在这条线上,使用一种被称为符号平方的技术可以显示与品牌或组织相关的含义中的紧张关系。话语分析和符号学广场的应用可以解释组织传播行为所产生的覆盖范围的变化。这可以通过在博览会前应用一项观察,并在应用必要的沟通行动后应用另一项观察来促进组织的价值观。与组织相关的价值观的自由变化可能是改善其媒体在业务中定位的重要因素。例如,埃克森美孚在股东大会被否决后采取了有利于环境的行动。该公司的所有者批评该组织管理不善,没有考虑到气候风险。这些行动的成功在数量和质量上都是可以衡量的,因为提供的结果的强度可以让股东接受。与Exxon相关的含义变化可能代表真正所有者对管理层的批准。在这项小型测试中,符号平方测量表明了从有利于污染物和不可持续的价值观向反污染物和不可再生的价值观的转变,并邀请进行更雄心勃勃的研究。通过案例研究,这项研究表明了两种迄今为止不受重视的工具的可能用途。话语分析和符号学广场的结合可以极大地帮助解释组织战略沟通中具体公共关系政策产生的结果。关键词公共关系、产出、结果、评价、话语分析、符号学http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-18-2019-07-119-142
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信