Comparison between two dosage regimens of enrofloxacin given in drinking water for treatment of induced air sacculitis in chicks

L. A. Al- Ani, A. A. Al-Khayyat, A. H. Abid
{"title":"Comparison between two dosage regimens of enrofloxacin given in drinking water for treatment of induced air sacculitis in chicks","authors":"L. A. Al- Ani, A. A. Al-Khayyat, A. H. Abid","doi":"10.30539/ijvm.v25i1.1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Response to treatment of induced air sacculitis by a pathogenic strain of E coli with enrofloxacin when it was given by the recommended therapeutic concentration (50 mg/ml) for 3 days in drinking water was compared with the method of giving the same drug at double the above concentration for one time after a period of thirstiness . Athird group of infected bird was left without treatment while a non – infected group was left as a negative control .  \nParameters of mortality , clinical symptoms, feed consumption , weight gain and feed conversion were measured to evaluate the effectiveness of either method of treatment. Also, after sacrifying of some birds one week and 3 weeks after infection, pathological lesions and air sacculitis index were considered.  \nThe results showed significant differences in most parameters between infected and non – infected groups while either of the two infected treated groups were intermediate between them.  \nThis result encourages the use of the suggested single method of treatment especially when cost of drug, full dosing and stability of drug are taken in consideration","PeriodicalId":22528,"journal":{"name":"The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30539/ijvm.v25i1.1155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Response to treatment of induced air sacculitis by a pathogenic strain of E coli with enrofloxacin when it was given by the recommended therapeutic concentration (50 mg/ml) for 3 days in drinking water was compared with the method of giving the same drug at double the above concentration for one time after a period of thirstiness . Athird group of infected bird was left without treatment while a non – infected group was left as a negative control .  Parameters of mortality , clinical symptoms, feed consumption , weight gain and feed conversion were measured to evaluate the effectiveness of either method of treatment. Also, after sacrifying of some birds one week and 3 weeks after infection, pathological lesions and air sacculitis index were considered.  The results showed significant differences in most parameters between infected and non – infected groups while either of the two infected treated groups were intermediate between them.  This result encourages the use of the suggested single method of treatment especially when cost of drug, full dosing and stability of drug are taken in consideration
饮水中给予恩诺沙星两种给药方案治疗雏鸡诱发性空气性球囊炎的比较
以推荐治疗浓度(50 mg/ml)给予恩诺沙星3 d饮水治疗致病性大肠杆菌诱导的空气性囊炎,并与口渴一段时间后以两倍浓度给予同一药物1次的方法进行比较。第三组感染的鸟不进行治疗,而未感染的鸟作为阴性对照。研究人员测量了死亡率、临床症状、饲料消耗、体重增加和饲料转化率等参数,以评估两种治疗方法的有效性。另外,在感染后1周和3周宰杀部分禽类后,考虑病理病变和空气球囊炎指数。结果显示,感染组和未感染组在大多数参数上存在显著差异,而两组感染治疗组均处于两者之间。这一结果鼓励使用建议的单一治疗方法,特别是当考虑到药物成本、充分剂量和药物稳定性时
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信