Effect of different dietary fibre sources on the zootechnical performance, feeding behaviour and intestinal physiology of growing and finishing pigs

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
J. Pichler, Florian Hemetsberger, Melanie Buchberger, C. Schwarz, K. Schedle
{"title":"Effect of different dietary fibre sources on the zootechnical performance, feeding behaviour and intestinal physiology of growing and finishing pigs","authors":"J. Pichler, Florian Hemetsberger, Melanie Buchberger, C. Schwarz, K. Schedle","doi":"10.17221/126/2021-cjas","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different sources of fibre in the diets of fattening pigs on performance, feeding behaviour and intestinal physiology. A total of 60 barrows and gilts (initial body weight 28.4 ± 0.4 kg) were allotted to four dietary treatments: control (CON), lignocellulose (LC), mycelium (MYC) and corn gluten feed (CGF). Diets were calculated to provide balanced available nutrient contents. Including MYC in the diet resulted in an increased average daily gain (P < 0.05) compared to CON and CGF, and improved gain to feed ratio (P < 0.05) compared to LC. Pigs in CON (P < 0.05) ate the fewest but largest meals, whereas treatment CGF (P < 0.05) showed the opposite effect, resulting in the same daily feeder occupation time. Regarding intestinal physiology, in ileum, no differences were observed between the contents of short chain fatty acids (SCFA), lactic acid and biogenic amines. In the colon, MYC showed an increased concentration of acetic acid (P < 0.05) as well as the total content of SCFA (P < 0.05), compared to LC and CGF. Distinct fermentation profiles of ammonia were recorded in ileal and colonic digesta, although contents remained below harmful concentrations. Morphometrical measurements showed differences between the fibre sources LC and MYC, as well as LC and the CON in all investigated gut sections. These results provide evidence that the inclusion of specific dietary fibre sources/contents can positively influence the gut morphology and performance of pigs. However, further studies are needed regarding the mode of action and physico-chemical characteristics of the different fibre sources as a precondition for their successful application in pig diets.","PeriodicalId":10972,"journal":{"name":"Czech Journal of Animal Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Czech Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/126/2021-cjas","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different sources of fibre in the diets of fattening pigs on performance, feeding behaviour and intestinal physiology. A total of 60 barrows and gilts (initial body weight 28.4 ± 0.4 kg) were allotted to four dietary treatments: control (CON), lignocellulose (LC), mycelium (MYC) and corn gluten feed (CGF). Diets were calculated to provide balanced available nutrient contents. Including MYC in the diet resulted in an increased average daily gain (P < 0.05) compared to CON and CGF, and improved gain to feed ratio (P < 0.05) compared to LC. Pigs in CON (P < 0.05) ate the fewest but largest meals, whereas treatment CGF (P < 0.05) showed the opposite effect, resulting in the same daily feeder occupation time. Regarding intestinal physiology, in ileum, no differences were observed between the contents of short chain fatty acids (SCFA), lactic acid and biogenic amines. In the colon, MYC showed an increased concentration of acetic acid (P < 0.05) as well as the total content of SCFA (P < 0.05), compared to LC and CGF. Distinct fermentation profiles of ammonia were recorded in ileal and colonic digesta, although contents remained below harmful concentrations. Morphometrical measurements showed differences between the fibre sources LC and MYC, as well as LC and the CON in all investigated gut sections. These results provide evidence that the inclusion of specific dietary fibre sources/contents can positively influence the gut morphology and performance of pigs. However, further studies are needed regarding the mode of action and physico-chemical characteristics of the different fibre sources as a precondition for their successful application in pig diets.
不同饲粮纤维来源对生长育肥猪动物生产性能、摄食行为和肠道生理的影响
本研究的目的是确定育肥猪日粮中不同纤维来源对生产性能、饲养行为和肠道生理的影响。将60头公猪和母猪(初始体重28.4±0.4 kg)分配给四个日粮处理:对照(CON)、木质纤维素(LC)、菌丝体(MYC)和玉米面筋饲料(CGF)。计算日粮以提供平衡的可用营养成分。与CON和CGF相比,在饮食中加入MYC导致平均日增重增加(P<0.05),与LC相比,增重与饲料比提高(P<0.05)。CON组的猪(P<0.05)进食最少但最多,而CGF组(P<0.05)则表现出相反的效果,导致相同的日饲养时间。关于肠道生理学,在回肠中,短链脂肪酸(SCFA)、乳酸和生物胺的含量没有差异。在结肠中,与LC和CGF相比,MYC的乙酸浓度(P<0.05)和SCFA的总含量(P<0.05)增加。回肠和结肠消化物中记录了不同的氨发酵特性,尽管含量仍低于有害浓度。形态计量学测量显示,在所有研究的肠道切片中,纤维源LC和MYC以及LC和CON之间存在差异。这些结果提供了证据,表明包含特定的膳食纤维来源/含量可以对猪的肠道形态和性能产生积极影响。然而,需要对不同纤维来源的作用模式和物理化学特性进行进一步的研究,这是它们在猪日粮中成功应用的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Czech Journal of Animal Science
Czech Journal of Animal Science Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Original scientific papers and critical reviews covering all areas of genetics and breeding, physiology, reproduction, nutrition and feeds, technology, ethology and economics of cattle, pig, sheep, goat, poultry, fish and other farm animal management. Papers are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信