Spatial variability of soil hydraulic and physical properties in erosive sloping agricultural fields

IF 3.7 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Deepak Singh , Alok Kumar Mishra , Sridhar Patra , Sankar Mariappan , Nisha Singh , Saswat Kumar Kar
{"title":"Spatial variability of soil hydraulic and physical properties in erosive sloping agricultural fields","authors":"Deepak Singh ,&nbsp;Alok Kumar Mishra ,&nbsp;Sridhar Patra ,&nbsp;Sankar Mariappan ,&nbsp;Nisha Singh ,&nbsp;Saswat Kumar Kar","doi":"10.1016/j.wse.2022.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is essential to minimize soil quality degradation in sloping agricultural fields through stabilization and improvement of soil hydraulic properties using sustainable soil management. This study aimed to analyze the impact of different tillage practices, including conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), and zero tillage (ZT), on soil hydraulic conductivity in a sloping agricultural field under maize–wheat rotation. The results showed that the highest runoff volume (257.40 m<sup>3</sup>), runoff coefficient (42.84%), and soil loss (11.3 t) were observed when the CT treatment was applied. In contrast, the lowest runoff volume (67.95 m<sup>3</sup>), runoff coefficient (11.35%), and soil loss (1.05 t) were observed when the ZT treatment was adopted. The soil organic carbon and aggregate mean weight diameter were found to be significantly greater (with mean values of 0.79% and 1.19 mm, respectively) with the ZT treatment than with the CT treatment. With the tilled treatments (CT and MT), substantial changes in the saturated soil hydraulic conductivity (<em>k</em><sub>s</sub>), near-saturated soil hydraulic conductivity (<em>k</em>), and water-conducting porosity (<em>ε</em>) were observed between two crop seasons. These three soil parameters were significantly higher in the period after maize harvesting than in the wheat growing period. In contrast, no significant difference in these soil parameters was found when the untilled treatment (ZT) was carried out. With regard to the slope positions, <em>k</em><sub>s</sub>, <em>k</em>, and <em>ε</em> showed different behaviors under different treatments. The toe slope position showed significantly lower <em>k</em><sub>s</sub> and <em>ε</em> values than the summit and middle slope positions. Of the evaluated tillage practices, ZT was found to be the most promising means to improve the soil hydro-physical properties and effectively reduce surface runoff and soil erosion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23628,"journal":{"name":"Water science and engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 57-66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water science and engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237022000849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is essential to minimize soil quality degradation in sloping agricultural fields through stabilization and improvement of soil hydraulic properties using sustainable soil management. This study aimed to analyze the impact of different tillage practices, including conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), and zero tillage (ZT), on soil hydraulic conductivity in a sloping agricultural field under maize–wheat rotation. The results showed that the highest runoff volume (257.40 m3), runoff coefficient (42.84%), and soil loss (11.3 t) were observed when the CT treatment was applied. In contrast, the lowest runoff volume (67.95 m3), runoff coefficient (11.35%), and soil loss (1.05 t) were observed when the ZT treatment was adopted. The soil organic carbon and aggregate mean weight diameter were found to be significantly greater (with mean values of 0.79% and 1.19 mm, respectively) with the ZT treatment than with the CT treatment. With the tilled treatments (CT and MT), substantial changes in the saturated soil hydraulic conductivity (ks), near-saturated soil hydraulic conductivity (k), and water-conducting porosity (ε) were observed between two crop seasons. These three soil parameters were significantly higher in the period after maize harvesting than in the wheat growing period. In contrast, no significant difference in these soil parameters was found when the untilled treatment (ZT) was carried out. With regard to the slope positions, ks, k, and ε showed different behaviors under different treatments. The toe slope position showed significantly lower ks and ε values than the summit and middle slope positions. Of the evaluated tillage practices, ZT was found to be the most promising means to improve the soil hydro-physical properties and effectively reduce surface runoff and soil erosion.

侵蚀性坡地土壤水力物理特性的空间变异性
通过可持续土壤管理稳定和改善土壤水力特性,最大限度地减少坡耕地土壤质量退化。本研究旨在分析常规耕作(CT)、最少耕作(MT)和免耕作(ZT)不同耕作方式对玉米-小麦轮作坡耕地土壤导电性的影响。结果表明,CT处理的径流量(257.40 m3)、径流系数(42.84%)和土壤流失量(11.3 t)最大;ZT处理的径流量最小(67.95 m3),径流系数最小(11.35%),土壤流失量最小(1.05 t)。ZT处理土壤有机碳和团聚体平均重径显著高于CT处理,平均值分别为0.79%和1.19 mm。不同耕作方式(CT和MT)的饱和土壤导水率(ks)、近饱和土壤导水率(k)和导水孔隙率(ε)在两个作物季节之间发生了显著变化。这三个土壤参数在玉米收获后显著高于小麦生育期。而未耕处理(ZT)对这些土壤参数的影响不显著。对于坡位,k、k和ε在不同处理下表现出不同的行为。坡脚位置的ks和ε值显著低于坡顶和坡中位置。在评估的耕作方式中,ZT被认为是改善土壤水物理性质和有效减少地表径流和土壤侵蚀的最有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
573
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Science and Engineering journal is an international, peer-reviewed research publication covering new concepts, theories, methods, and techniques related to water issues. The journal aims to publish research that helps advance the theoretical and practical understanding of water resources, aquatic environment, aquatic ecology, and water engineering, with emphases placed on the innovation and applicability of science and technology in large-scale hydropower project construction, large river and lake regulation, inter-basin water transfer, hydroelectric energy development, ecological restoration, the development of new materials, and sustainable utilization of water resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信