The Conflict in Ukraine: Regional and Global Contexts

I. Safranchuk
{"title":"The Conflict in Ukraine: Regional and Global Contexts","authors":"I. Safranchuk","doi":"10.13169/polipers.19.1.ca1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political context of the current war crisis in Ukraine has at least three layers. To start from the bottom, the first layer is the crisis of the Minsk Accords.1 After the anti-Russia coup in Kyiv in February 2014, pro-Russia popular movements consolidated in several regions of Ukraine. In Crimea, this developed into separating from Ukraine and integrating into Russia. In several other regions like Odessa and Kharkov, such movements were forcefully suppressed. But in the two regions, Donetsk and Lugansk, they managed to survive as de facto, unrecognized states, fighting Kyiv. To stop that war, two Minsk accords were concluded with the mediation of Russia, France, and Germany. The accords provided ceasefire and political reform, including constitutional amendments, to give these pro-Russia regions special status within Ukraine. However, these accords were never fully implemented. Kyiv temporized because the nationalistic movements in Ukraine strongly opposed their implementation. One of the central elements of Volodymyr Zelensky’s presidential campaign in 2019 was the promise of peaceful reintegration of Donetsk and Lugansk separatist regions, which implied implementation of the Mink accords. After his election, however, President Zelensky came to the position of denying the Minsk agreements. Now Russian officials claim that Ukraine was preparing for a military assault on the separatist regions in 2022 to reintegrate them by force rather than through the implementation of the Minsk Accords. The sabotage and finally denial of the Minsk Accords logically implied the return to warfare, which these accords put an end to in 2014.","PeriodicalId":30465,"journal":{"name":"Policy Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.19.1.ca1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The political context of the current war crisis in Ukraine has at least three layers. To start from the bottom, the first layer is the crisis of the Minsk Accords.1 After the anti-Russia coup in Kyiv in February 2014, pro-Russia popular movements consolidated in several regions of Ukraine. In Crimea, this developed into separating from Ukraine and integrating into Russia. In several other regions like Odessa and Kharkov, such movements were forcefully suppressed. But in the two regions, Donetsk and Lugansk, they managed to survive as de facto, unrecognized states, fighting Kyiv. To stop that war, two Minsk accords were concluded with the mediation of Russia, France, and Germany. The accords provided ceasefire and political reform, including constitutional amendments, to give these pro-Russia regions special status within Ukraine. However, these accords were never fully implemented. Kyiv temporized because the nationalistic movements in Ukraine strongly opposed their implementation. One of the central elements of Volodymyr Zelensky’s presidential campaign in 2019 was the promise of peaceful reintegration of Donetsk and Lugansk separatist regions, which implied implementation of the Mink accords. After his election, however, President Zelensky came to the position of denying the Minsk agreements. Now Russian officials claim that Ukraine was preparing for a military assault on the separatist regions in 2022 to reintegrate them by force rather than through the implementation of the Minsk Accords. The sabotage and finally denial of the Minsk Accords logically implied the return to warfare, which these accords put an end to in 2014.
乌克兰冲突:区域和全球背景
乌克兰当前战争危机的政治背景至少有三层。从底层开始,第一层是《明斯克协议》的危机。1 2014年2月基辅发生反俄政变后,亲俄民众运动在乌克兰的几个地区得到了巩固。在克里米亚,这发展为从乌克兰分离并融入俄罗斯。在敖德萨和哈尔科夫等其他几个地区,这种运动遭到了强力镇压。但在顿涅茨克和卢甘斯克这两个地区,他们作为事实上未被承认的国家,与基辅作战,成功地生存了下来。为了阻止这场战争,在俄罗斯、法国和德国的斡旋下,双方达成了两项明斯克协议。这些协议规定了停火和政治改革,包括宪法修正案,以赋予这些亲俄地区在乌克兰境内的特殊地位。然而,这些协定从未得到充分执行。基辅之所以拖延,是因为乌克兰的民族主义运动强烈反对实施这些措施。沃洛德米尔·泽连斯基2019年总统竞选的核心内容之一是承诺顿涅茨克和卢甘斯克分离主义地区和平重返社会,这意味着执行《明克协议》。然而,在当选后,泽连斯基总统采取了否认明斯克协议的立场。现在,俄罗斯官员声称,乌克兰正准备在2022年对分离主义地区发动军事袭击,以武力而不是通过实施《明斯克协议》使其重新融入社会。破坏并最终否认《明斯克协议》在逻辑上意味着战争的回归,这些协议在2014年结束了战争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书