Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus desflurane anesthesia on natural killer cell cytotoxicity after hepatocellular carcinoma resection

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kirada Apisutimaitri, Pipat Saeyup, K. Suppipat, Pongserath Sirichindakul, Nattanit Wanasrisant, Chawisachon Nonsri, Panas Lertprapai
{"title":"Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus desflurane anesthesia on natural killer cell cytotoxicity after hepatocellular carcinoma resection","authors":"Kirada Apisutimaitri, Pipat Saeyup, K. Suppipat, Pongserath Sirichindakul, Nattanit Wanasrisant, Chawisachon Nonsri, Panas Lertprapai","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_174_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Inhalation anesthesia suppresses the immune system and stimulates the growth of tumor cells, contrary to intravenous anesthesia. However, no consensus exists on which anesthetic technique is better for preventing cancer recurrence. Therefore, this study compared the effects of two different anesthetic techniques on natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing open hepatic resection.\n \n \n \n Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic HCC were scheduled for hepatic resection and randomly assigned to receive either propofol- or desflurane-based anesthesia. The primary outcome was pre- and postoperative NKCC assay. Cytokine levels were assessed by measuring interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels, and the secondary outcome was postoperative cancer recurrence evaluated using diagnostic imaging scans for 2 years.\n \n \n \n Twenty-eight patients were analyzed, including 15 and 13 in the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation (INH) groups, respectively. Two patients in the INH group were excluded due to non-HCC postoperative pathologic results. At 24 h, the postoperative change in NKCC between both groups showed no significant differences at a ratio of effector cell: target cell = 1:1, 5:1, and 10:1 (P = 0.345, 0.345, and 0.565, respectively). Also, there were no significant differences in IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels (P = 0.588, 0.182, 0.730, 0.076, 0.518, 0.533, respectively). Postoperative tumor recurrence occurred in five and six patients in the TIVA and INH groups, respectively.\n \n \n \n NKCC did not differ significantly among HCC patients undergoing open hepatic resection under either propofol or desflurane anesthesia 24 h postoperatively.\n","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_174_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inhalation anesthesia suppresses the immune system and stimulates the growth of tumor cells, contrary to intravenous anesthesia. However, no consensus exists on which anesthetic technique is better for preventing cancer recurrence. Therefore, this study compared the effects of two different anesthetic techniques on natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing open hepatic resection. Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic HCC were scheduled for hepatic resection and randomly assigned to receive either propofol- or desflurane-based anesthesia. The primary outcome was pre- and postoperative NKCC assay. Cytokine levels were assessed by measuring interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels, and the secondary outcome was postoperative cancer recurrence evaluated using diagnostic imaging scans for 2 years. Twenty-eight patients were analyzed, including 15 and 13 in the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation (INH) groups, respectively. Two patients in the INH group were excluded due to non-HCC postoperative pathologic results. At 24 h, the postoperative change in NKCC between both groups showed no significant differences at a ratio of effector cell: target cell = 1:1, 5:1, and 10:1 (P = 0.345, 0.345, and 0.565, respectively). Also, there were no significant differences in IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels (P = 0.588, 0.182, 0.730, 0.076, 0.518, 0.533, respectively). Postoperative tumor recurrence occurred in five and six patients in the TIVA and INH groups, respectively. NKCC did not differ significantly among HCC patients undergoing open hepatic resection under either propofol or desflurane anesthesia 24 h postoperatively.
丙泊酚全静脉麻醉与地氟醚麻醉对肝癌切除后自然杀伤细胞毒性的影响
与静脉麻醉相反,吸入麻醉抑制免疫系统,刺激肿瘤细胞生长。然而,对于哪种麻醉技术能更好地预防癌症复发,目前还没有达成共识。因此,本研究比较了两种不同麻醉技术对肝细胞癌(HCC)开放性肝切除术患者自然杀伤细胞毒性(NKCC)的影响。诊断为非转移性HCC的患者计划进行肝切除术,并随机分配接受异丙酚或地氟醚麻醉。主要结果是术前和术后的NKCC检测。通过测量白细胞介素(IL)-2、IL-4、IL-6、IL-10、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)和干扰素-γ (IFN-γ)水平来评估细胞因子水平,并通过2年的诊断成像扫描评估术后癌症复发。分析28例患者,其中全静脉麻醉组(TIVA) 15例,吸入组(INH) 13例。INH组2例患者因非hcc术后病理结果被排除。24 h时,两组术后NKCC变化在效应细胞与靶细胞比例为1:1、5:1、10:1时差异无统计学意义(P分别为0.345、0.345、0.565)。各组IL-2、IL-4、IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α、IFN-γ水平差异无统计学意义(P值分别为0.588、0.182、0.730、0.076、0.518、0.533)。TIVA组术后肿瘤复发5例,INH组术后肿瘤复发6例。术后24 h在异丙酚或地氟醚麻醉下行开放肝切除术的HCC患者中,NKCC无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信