Obstacles and Opportunities in Information Transfer Regarding Medications at Discharge – A Focus Group Study with Hospital Physicians

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria Glans, P. Midlöv, Annika Kragh Ekstam, Å. Bondesson, A. Brorsson
{"title":"Obstacles and Opportunities in Information Transfer Regarding Medications at Discharge – A Focus Group Study with Hospital Physicians","authors":"Maria Glans, P. Midlöv, Annika Kragh Ekstam, Å. Bondesson, A. Brorsson","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S362189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This qualitative study aimed to investigate experiences and perceptions of hospital physicians regarding the discharging process, focusing on information transfer regarding medications. Methods By purposive sampling three focus groups were formed. To facilitate discussions and maintain consistency, a semi-structured interview guide was used. Discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the anonymized data. A confirmatory analysis concluded that the main findings were supported by data. Results Identified obstacles were divided into three categories with two sub-categories each: Infrastructure; IT-systems currently used are suboptimal and complex. Hospital and primary care use different electronic medical records, complicating matters. The work organization is not helping with time scarcity and lack of continuity. Distinct routines could help create continuity but are not always in place, known, and/or followed. Physician: knowledge and education in the systems is not always provided nor prioritized. Understanding the consequences of not following routines and taking responsibility regarding the medications list is important. Not everyone has the self-reliance or willingness to do so. Patient/next of kin: For patients to provide information on medications used is not always easy when hospitalized. Understanding information provided can be hard, especially when medical jargon is used and there is no one available to provide support. A central theme, “We're only human”, encompasses how physicians do their best despite difficult conditions. Conclusion There are several obstacles in transferring information regarding medications at discharge. Issues regarding infrastructure are seldom possible for the individual physician to influence. However, several issues raised by the participating physicians are possible to act upon. In doing so medication errors in care transitions might decrease and information transfer at discharge might improve.","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"14 1","pages":"61 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S362189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This qualitative study aimed to investigate experiences and perceptions of hospital physicians regarding the discharging process, focusing on information transfer regarding medications. Methods By purposive sampling three focus groups were formed. To facilitate discussions and maintain consistency, a semi-structured interview guide was used. Discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the anonymized data. A confirmatory analysis concluded that the main findings were supported by data. Results Identified obstacles were divided into three categories with two sub-categories each: Infrastructure; IT-systems currently used are suboptimal and complex. Hospital and primary care use different electronic medical records, complicating matters. The work organization is not helping with time scarcity and lack of continuity. Distinct routines could help create continuity but are not always in place, known, and/or followed. Physician: knowledge and education in the systems is not always provided nor prioritized. Understanding the consequences of not following routines and taking responsibility regarding the medications list is important. Not everyone has the self-reliance or willingness to do so. Patient/next of kin: For patients to provide information on medications used is not always easy when hospitalized. Understanding information provided can be hard, especially when medical jargon is used and there is no one available to provide support. A central theme, “We're only human”, encompasses how physicians do their best despite difficult conditions. Conclusion There are several obstacles in transferring information regarding medications at discharge. Issues regarding infrastructure are seldom possible for the individual physician to influence. However, several issues raised by the participating physicians are possible to act upon. In doing so medication errors in care transitions might decrease and information transfer at discharge might improve.
出院时药物信息传递的障碍和机会——与医院医生的焦点小组研究
目的本质性研究旨在探讨医院医师在出院过程中的经验与认知,并聚焦于药物资讯的传递。方法采用有目的抽样的方法,形成三个焦点组。为了促进讨论和保持一致性,采用了半结构化访谈指南。讨论录音并逐字抄录。采用定性内容分析对匿名数据进行分析。一项验证性分析的结论是,主要发现得到了数据的支持。结果识别出的障碍分为三类,每两个子类别:基础设施;目前使用的it系统不是最优的,而且很复杂。医院和初级保健使用不同的电子医疗记录,使问题复杂化。由于时间短缺和缺乏连续性,工作组织没有帮助。不同的例程可以帮助创建连续性,但并不总是到位,已知和/或遵循。医生:系统中的知识和教育并不总是提供或优先考虑。了解不遵循常规的后果和对药物清单负责是很重要的。不是每个人都有自力更生或愿意这样做。患者/近亲属:对于住院患者来说,提供所使用药物的信息并不总是容易的。理解所提供的信息可能很困难,尤其是在使用医学术语并且没有人可以提供支持的情况下。影片的中心主题是“我们只是人”,讲述了医生如何在困难的条件下尽力而为。结论出院时药物信息传递存在诸多障碍。有关基础设施的问题很少有可能由医生个人来影响。然而,参与的医生提出的几个问题是可以采取行动的。这样做,在护理过渡期间的药物错误可能会减少,出院时的信息传递可能会改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信