Rationales and Support for Norms in the Context of Covid-19

IF 2.1 2区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Social Psychology Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.1177/01902725221107594

Christine Horne, M. Johnson

引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study empirically tests whether people invoke moral and prudential rationales when evaluating behavior in a novel context—the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States—and whether those rationales are associated with their support for a norm. We use data from two online vignette experiments that describe key health behaviors—staying home and masking—and find substantial support. Given the politicization of these behaviors in the U.S. context, we also explore the role of political orientation and find that liberal participants react more strongly to the behaviors.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Covid-19背景下规范的依据和支持

这项研究通过实证检验了人们在新环境下(美国新冠肺炎大流行的最初几个月)评估行为时是否会援引道德和审慎的理性，以及这些理性是否与他们对规范的支持有关。我们使用了两个在线小插图实验的数据，这些实验描述了关键的健康行为——呆在家里和戴口罩——并找到了大量的支持。考虑到这些行为在美国的政治化，我们还探讨了政治取向的作用，发现自由派参与者对这些行为的反应更强烈。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Psychology Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

3.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： SPPS is a unique short reports journal in social and personality psychology. Its aim is to publish cutting-edge, short reports of single studies, or very succinct reports of multiple studies, and will be geared toward a speedy review and publication process to allow groundbreaking research to be quickly available to the field. Preferences will be given to articles that •have theoretical and practical significance •represent an advance to social psychological or personality science •will be of broad interest both within and outside of social and personality psychology •are written to be intelligible to a wide range of readers including science writers for the popular press