“Checking a Box Isn’t Exactly Helpful”: Interpretations of the Voluntary Self-Identification of Disability Form During the Job Application Process

Kaylin L. Duncan, Patricia M. Sias
{"title":"“Checking a Box Isn’t Exactly Helpful”: Interpretations of the Voluntary Self-Identification of Disability Form During the Job Application Process","authors":"Kaylin L. Duncan, Patricia M. Sias","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v42i3-4.7997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States Department of Labor created the Voluntary Self-Identification of Disability (VSD) form in 2014 to improve the employment rate for people with disabilities. As part of this initiative, federal contractors with 50 or more employees are expected to have at least 7% of their workforce identify as having a disability. Unfortunately, only 13% of organizations met this goal in 2015. By conducting a survey of 472 individuals, the present study examined how people with and without disabilities interpret the Voluntary Self-Identification of Disability (VSD) form during the job application process. Specifically, respondents inferred positive (e.g., accommodations), negative (e.g., discrimination), neutral (e.g., person-job fit), and conflicting interpretations (e.g., a mix of positive and negative interpretations) of the VSD form.\nFurther, nearly 60 percent of applicants perceived the VSD form as a strategy to decrease the number of people with disabilities rather than increase. With insight on organizational signals, employers and policymakers can better design and develop recruitment materials to improve the application process for people with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":55735,"journal":{"name":"Disability Studies Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v42i3-4.7997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States Department of Labor created the Voluntary Self-Identification of Disability (VSD) form in 2014 to improve the employment rate for people with disabilities. As part of this initiative, federal contractors with 50 or more employees are expected to have at least 7% of their workforce identify as having a disability. Unfortunately, only 13% of organizations met this goal in 2015. By conducting a survey of 472 individuals, the present study examined how people with and without disabilities interpret the Voluntary Self-Identification of Disability (VSD) form during the job application process. Specifically, respondents inferred positive (e.g., accommodations), negative (e.g., discrimination), neutral (e.g., person-job fit), and conflicting interpretations (e.g., a mix of positive and negative interpretations) of the VSD form. Further, nearly 60 percent of applicants perceived the VSD form as a strategy to decrease the number of people with disabilities rather than increase. With insight on organizational signals, employers and policymakers can better design and develop recruitment materials to improve the application process for people with disabilities.
“打勾并不完全有用”:对求职过程中残疾自愿自我识别表的解读
美国劳工部于2014年创建了残疾自愿自我识别(VSD)表格,以提高残疾人的就业率。作为这项计划的一部分,拥有50名或更多雇员的联邦承包商预计至少有7%的员工被认定为残疾。不幸的是,2015年只有13%的组织实现了这一目标。本研究通过对472名个体的调查,考察了残疾人士和非残疾人士在求职过程中对残疾自愿自我认同表的理解。具体来说,受访者对VSD表的正面(例如,住宿)、负面(例如,歧视)、中性(例如,个人与工作的契合)和相互矛盾的解释(例如,正面和负面解释的混合)进行了推断。此外,近60%的申请人认为VSD表格是一种减少而不是增加残疾人数量的策略。有了对组织信号的洞察,雇主和决策者可以更好地设计和开发招聘材料,以改善残疾人的申请流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信