Who will like me? Individual differences in the sources of meta-liking judgments at zero-acquaintance

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Norhan Elsaadawy, Erika N. Carlson, Victoria Pringle
{"title":"Who will like me? Individual differences in the sources of meta-liking judgments at zero-acquaintance","authors":"Norhan Elsaadawy,&nbsp;Erika N. Carlson,&nbsp;Victoria Pringle","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People have general working models of how likeable they are from past experiences, but do some people apply these models more flexibly than others? In two studies, we used the extended Social Relations Model to index how much within-person variability in people’s meta-liking judgments at zero-acquaintance was the result of tracking a shared reality of target differences (sensitivity) versus distinguishing between targets in unique ways (differentiation). We found that the main source of variability was making unique distinctions across targets (differentiation). Importantly, there were individual differences in both sensitivity and differentiation, and the latter was related to narcissism, social anxiety, and neuroticism. This work demonstrates the flexibility of some people’s working models of themselves in relation to others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656623000740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People have general working models of how likeable they are from past experiences, but do some people apply these models more flexibly than others? In two studies, we used the extended Social Relations Model to index how much within-person variability in people’s meta-liking judgments at zero-acquaintance was the result of tracking a shared reality of target differences (sensitivity) versus distinguishing between targets in unique ways (differentiation). We found that the main source of variability was making unique distinctions across targets (differentiation). Importantly, there were individual differences in both sensitivity and differentiation, and the latter was related to narcissism, social anxiety, and neuroticism. This work demonstrates the flexibility of some people’s working models of themselves in relation to others.

谁会喜欢我?零认识时元好感判断来源的个体差异
人们从过去的经历中得出了自己有多讨人喜欢的一般工作模式,但有些人会比其他人更灵活地应用这些模式吗?在两项研究中,我们使用扩展的社会关系模型来索引人们在零熟人时的元喜好判断中有多大程度的人内可变性是跟踪目标差异(敏感性)与以独特方式区分目标(差异化)的共同现实的结果。我们发现变异性的主要来源是在目标之间进行独特的区分(分化)。重要的是,敏感性和分化都存在个体差异,后者与自恋、社交焦虑和神经质有关。这项工作展示了一些人的工作模式相对于其他人的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信