Integrating Better but Multilingually: Language Practices of South Asian Immigrants for Settlement and Integration in Canada

Q1 Social Sciences
Kashif Raza
{"title":"Integrating Better but Multilingually: Language Practices of South Asian Immigrants for Settlement and Integration in Canada","authors":"Kashif Raza","doi":"10.29333/ejecs/1626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian Index for Measuring Integration (CIMI) is used by researchers, policy analysts, and government agencies to evaluate newcomer performance against the local-born population across four dimensions: economic, social, political, and health. Despite recognizing integration as a multidimensional and complex phenomenon, the index mainly evaluates the achievement of the four dimensions but without looking at how they are achieved (e.g., the role of different languages) and the type of integration (narrowed or broader) taking place. One underlying assumption can be that since Canada is a bilingual country, one of the official languages must be used for settlement and integration. However, as this study finds, this may not reflect the social reality of the Canadian society where diverse immigrant populations capitalize on official and non-official languages for settlement and integration. Utilizing the four dimensions with language as an additional variable, this quantitative study reports findings from 493 participants from a sub-group of South Asians from Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan who are able to settle and integrate better when English and ethnic languages are used for socio-politico-economic and health integration. In addition to reporting micro-level multilingual integration supported by ethnic concentrations, this study calls for further investigation of the type of integration in ethnic concentrations and its long-term implications for the Canadian society.","PeriodicalId":37174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canadian Index for Measuring Integration (CIMI) is used by researchers, policy analysts, and government agencies to evaluate newcomer performance against the local-born population across four dimensions: economic, social, political, and health. Despite recognizing integration as a multidimensional and complex phenomenon, the index mainly evaluates the achievement of the four dimensions but without looking at how they are achieved (e.g., the role of different languages) and the type of integration (narrowed or broader) taking place. One underlying assumption can be that since Canada is a bilingual country, one of the official languages must be used for settlement and integration. However, as this study finds, this may not reflect the social reality of the Canadian society where diverse immigrant populations capitalize on official and non-official languages for settlement and integration. Utilizing the four dimensions with language as an additional variable, this quantitative study reports findings from 493 participants from a sub-group of South Asians from Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan who are able to settle and integrate better when English and ethnic languages are used for socio-politico-economic and health integration. In addition to reporting micro-level multilingual integration supported by ethnic concentrations, this study calls for further investigation of the type of integration in ethnic concentrations and its long-term implications for the Canadian society.
更好地融合但多语言:南亚移民在加拿大定居和融合的语言实践
研究人员、政策分析师和政府机构使用加拿大整合指数(CIMI),从经济、社会、政治和健康四个方面来评估新移民与当地出生人口的表现。尽管认识到整合是一个多维和复杂的现象,但该指数主要评估四个维度的成就,而不考虑如何实现这些目标(例如,不同语言的作用)以及正在发生的整合类型(狭窄或广泛)。一个基本的假设是,由于加拿大是一个双语国家,定居和融合必须使用一种官方语言。然而,正如本研究发现的那样,这可能并不能反映加拿大社会的社会现实,即不同的移民人口利用官方和非官方语言来定居和融入。利用语言作为附加变量的四个维度,本定量研究报告了来自孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦的南亚亚组的493名参与者的研究结果,当使用英语和民族语言进行社会政治经济和健康整合时,他们能够更好地定居和融入。除了报告种族集中支持的微观层面的多语言融合外,本研究还呼吁进一步调查种族集中的融合类型及其对加拿大社会的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信