Validation of the Korean Version of the Depression in Old Age Scale and Comparison with Other Depression Screening Questionnaires Used in Elderly Patients in Medical Settings

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Young-Eun Jung, Moon-Doo Kim, W. Bahk, Y. Woo, Beomwoo Nam, J. Seo, Sae-Heon Jang, H. Sung, I. Shim, B. Yoon, Ji Sun Kim, Y. Kwon
{"title":"Validation of the Korean Version of the Depression in Old Age Scale and Comparison with Other Depression Screening Questionnaires Used in Elderly Patients in Medical Settings","authors":"Young-Eun Jung, Moon-Doo Kim, W. Bahk, Y. Woo, Beomwoo Nam, J. Seo, Sae-Heon Jang, H. Sung, I. Shim, B. Yoon, Ji Sun Kim, Y. Kwon","doi":"10.9758/cpn.2019.17.3.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The Depression in Old Age Scale (DIA-S) is a new screening tool for assessing depression in the elderly. The primary aims of this study were to describe the validation of the Korean version of the DIA-S (K-DIA-S) and to compare its validity with that of other depression screening questionnaires used in elderly outpatients in medical settings. Methods A total of 385 elderly outpatients completed the K-DIA-S and underwent the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview to diagnose depressive disorders. Other measures included the 15-item short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS), the 9-item depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Reliability and validity tests, an optimal cutoff point estimate, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to investigate the diagnostic validity of the K-DIA-S. Areas under the curves (AUCs) for the K-DIA-S, SGDS, and PHQ-9 were compared statistically. Results The K-DIA-S showed good internal consistency and strong correlations with the SGDS (r = 0.853), PHQ-9 (r = 0.739), and MADRS (r = 0.772). The cut-off point of the K-DIA-S that can be recommended for screening depressive symptoms was a score of 4. For “any depressive disorder”, the AUC (standard error) for the K-DIA-S was 0.896 (0.015), which was significantly larger than that for the PHQ-9 (p = 0.033). Conclusion The present findings suggest that the K-DIA-S has good psychometric properties and is a valid and reliable tool for assessing depressive symptoms in elderly populations and medically ill patients.","PeriodicalId":10420,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","volume":"17 1","pages":"369 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2019.17.3.369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective The Depression in Old Age Scale (DIA-S) is a new screening tool for assessing depression in the elderly. The primary aims of this study were to describe the validation of the Korean version of the DIA-S (K-DIA-S) and to compare its validity with that of other depression screening questionnaires used in elderly outpatients in medical settings. Methods A total of 385 elderly outpatients completed the K-DIA-S and underwent the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview to diagnose depressive disorders. Other measures included the 15-item short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS), the 9-item depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Reliability and validity tests, an optimal cutoff point estimate, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to investigate the diagnostic validity of the K-DIA-S. Areas under the curves (AUCs) for the K-DIA-S, SGDS, and PHQ-9 were compared statistically. Results The K-DIA-S showed good internal consistency and strong correlations with the SGDS (r = 0.853), PHQ-9 (r = 0.739), and MADRS (r = 0.772). The cut-off point of the K-DIA-S that can be recommended for screening depressive symptoms was a score of 4. For “any depressive disorder”, the AUC (standard error) for the K-DIA-S was 0.896 (0.015), which was significantly larger than that for the PHQ-9 (p = 0.033). Conclusion The present findings suggest that the K-DIA-S has good psychometric properties and is a valid and reliable tool for assessing depressive symptoms in elderly populations and medically ill patients.
韩国版老年抑郁症量表的验证及与其他医疗机构老年患者抑郁症筛查问卷的比较
目的老年抑郁量表(DIA-S)是评估老年人抑郁的一种新的筛查工具。本研究的主要目的是描述韩国版抑郁症筛查问卷(K-DIA-S)的有效性,并将其与医疗机构中用于老年门诊患者的其他抑郁症筛查问卷的有效性进行比较。方法对385例老年门诊患者进行K-DIA-S和Mini国际神经精神病学访谈诊断抑郁症。其他测量方法包括老年抑郁量表(SGDS)的15项简短形式,患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)的9项抑郁模块和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)。通过信度和效度检验、最佳截止点估计和受试者工作特征曲线分析来研究K-DIA-S的诊断效度。比较K-DIA-S、SGDS和PHQ-9的曲线下面积(aus)。结果K-DIA-S具有良好的内部一致性,与SGDS (r = 0.853)、PHQ-9 (r = 0.739)、MADRS (r = 0.772)具有较强的相关性。推荐用于筛查抑郁症状的K-DIA-S分界点为4分。对于“任意抑郁障碍”,K-DIA-S的AUC(标准误差)为0.896(0.015),显著大于PHQ-9 (p = 0.033)。结论K-DIA-S量表具有良好的心理测量特性,是评估老年人和内科疾病患者抑郁症状的有效、可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCESPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci) launched in 2003, is the official journal of The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology (KCNP), and the associate journal for Asian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (AsCNP). This journal aims to publish evidence-based, scientifically written articles related to clinical and preclinical studies in the field of psychopharmacology and neuroscience. This journal intends to foster and encourage communications between psychiatrist, neuroscientist and all related experts in Asia as well as worldwide. It is published four times a year at the last day of February, May, August, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信