Comparison of Electronic Cow Record (REKS-EL) Feature with Recording Components Used by Dairy Farmers In Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta

Y. Suranindyah, Glorina Desviani Desviani, D. Maharani
{"title":"Comparison of Electronic Cow Record (REKS-EL) Feature with Recording Components Used by Dairy Farmers In Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta","authors":"Y. Suranindyah, Glorina Desviani Desviani, D. Maharani","doi":"10.21059/buletinpeternak.v46i2.72424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted in 60 respondents of dairy farmers in Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta from August 2020 to February 2021. The study aims to make comparison between recording in the REKS-EL version 1.0 and those in dairy farms recording, in order to improve REKS-EL features. Data of the farmers characteristics and recording components were collected by interviewed. Identification of components the dairy farmers recording was carried out using a list of questions in a table. The list containing 43 components, which were arranged based on the recording guidelines as written in the Indonesian Minister of Agriculture No. 100, 2014. The result of comparison between dairy farmers recording and REKS-EL version 1.0 feature showed differences on recording content. Software REKS-EL has more recording components than  dairy farmers recording, as much as 23 Vs. 13 (46% Vs 23% of total components). The REKS-EL feature showed advantages on data of pedigree, and reproduction but needs to be improved with the additional components derived from farmers records, namely daily and weekly milk production. In the REKS-EL feature also needs to be added feed data, BCS and calf after born.  ","PeriodicalId":31305,"journal":{"name":"Buletin Peternakan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buletin Peternakan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v46i2.72424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was conducted in 60 respondents of dairy farmers in Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta from August 2020 to February 2021. The study aims to make comparison between recording in the REKS-EL version 1.0 and those in dairy farms recording, in order to improve REKS-EL features. Data of the farmers characteristics and recording components were collected by interviewed. Identification of components the dairy farmers recording was carried out using a list of questions in a table. The list containing 43 components, which were arranged based on the recording guidelines as written in the Indonesian Minister of Agriculture No. 100, 2014. The result of comparison between dairy farmers recording and REKS-EL version 1.0 feature showed differences on recording content. Software REKS-EL has more recording components than  dairy farmers recording, as much as 23 Vs. 13 (46% Vs 23% of total components). The REKS-EL feature showed advantages on data of pedigree, and reproduction but needs to be improved with the additional components derived from farmers records, namely daily and weekly milk production. In the REKS-EL feature also needs to be added feed data, BCS and calf after born.  
电子奶牛记录(REKS-EL)功能与日惹Sleman Regency奶农使用的记录组件的比较
该研究于2020年8月至2021年2月在日惹Sleman Regency的60名奶农中进行。本研究旨在对REKS-EL 1.0版本的记录与奶牛场的记录进行比较,以改进REKS-EL的功能。通过访谈收集农户特征和记录成分的数据。使用表格中的问题列表对奶农记录的成分进行识别。该清单包含43个组成部分,这些组成部分是根据印度尼西亚农业部长2014年第100号文件中所写的记录指南进行安排的。奶农记录与REKS-EL 1.0版本功能的对比结果显示,记录内容存在差异。REKS-EL软件比奶农记录更多的记录组件,多达23个对13个(46%对23%的总组件)。REKS-EL特征在家谱和繁殖数据方面显示出优势,但需要通过来自农民记录的额外成分(即每日和每周产奶量)进行改进。在REKS-EL功能中还需要添加饲料数据,BCS和小牛出生后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书