Clinical and radiographic evaluations of implants as surveyed crowns for Class I removable partial dentures: A retrospective study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Soo-Yeon Yoo, Seong-Kyun Kim, S. Heo, J. Koak
{"title":"Clinical and radiographic evaluations of implants as surveyed crowns for Class I removable partial dentures: A retrospective study","authors":"Soo-Yeon Yoo, Seong-Kyun Kim, S. Heo, J. Koak","doi":"10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants in IC-RPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy implants were placed and used as surveyed crowns in 30 RPDs. The survival rates and MBL around implants based on multiple variables, e.g., position, sex, age, opposing dentitions, splinting, type of used retainer, and first year bone loss, were analyzed. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) regarding functional/esthetic improvement after IC-RPD treatment, and complications were also inspected. RESULTS The 100% implant survival rates were observed, and 60 of those implants showed MBL levels less than 1.5 mm. No significant differences in MBL of implants were observed between implant positions (maxilla vs. mandible; P = .341) and type of used retainers (P = .630). The implant MBL of greater than 0.5 mm at 1 year showed significantly higher MBL after that (P < .001). Splinted implant surveyed crowns showed lower MBL in the maxilla (splinted vs. non-splinted; P = .037). There were significant esthetic/functional improvements observed after treatment, but there were no significant differences in esthetic results based on implant position (maxilla vs. mandible). Implants in mandible showed significantly greater improvement in function than implants in the maxilla (P = .002). Prosthetic complication of IC-RPD was not observed frequently. However, 2 abutment teeth among 60 were failed. The bone loss of abutment teeth was lower than MBL of implants in IC-RPDs (P = .001). CONCLUSION Class I RPD connected to residual teeth and strategically positioned implants as surveyed crowns can be a viable treatment modality.","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":"14 1","pages":"108 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants in IC-RPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy implants were placed and used as surveyed crowns in 30 RPDs. The survival rates and MBL around implants based on multiple variables, e.g., position, sex, age, opposing dentitions, splinting, type of used retainer, and first year bone loss, were analyzed. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) regarding functional/esthetic improvement after IC-RPD treatment, and complications were also inspected. RESULTS The 100% implant survival rates were observed, and 60 of those implants showed MBL levels less than 1.5 mm. No significant differences in MBL of implants were observed between implant positions (maxilla vs. mandible; P = .341) and type of used retainers (P = .630). The implant MBL of greater than 0.5 mm at 1 year showed significantly higher MBL after that (P < .001). Splinted implant surveyed crowns showed lower MBL in the maxilla (splinted vs. non-splinted; P = .037). There were significant esthetic/functional improvements observed after treatment, but there were no significant differences in esthetic results based on implant position (maxilla vs. mandible). Implants in mandible showed significantly greater improvement in function than implants in the maxilla (P = .002). Prosthetic complication of IC-RPD was not observed frequently. However, 2 abutment teeth among 60 were failed. The bone loss of abutment teeth was lower than MBL of implants in IC-RPDs (P = .001). CONCLUSION Class I RPD connected to residual teeth and strategically positioned implants as surveyed crowns can be a viable treatment modality.
种植体作为I类可摘局部义齿测量牙冠的临床和放射学评价:一项回顾性研究
本研究的目的是评估IC RPD植入物的生存率和边缘骨丢失(MBL)。材料和方法在30个RPD中放置并使用70个植入物作为测量牙冠。基于多个变量,如位置、性别、年龄、相对牙列、夹板固定、使用的固定器类型和第一年骨丢失,分析了植入物周围的存活率和MBL。还检查了患者报告的IC-RPD治疗后功能/美观改善的结果指标(PROM)和并发症。结果植入物的存活率为100%,其中60个植入物的MBL水平小于1.5mm。种植体的MBL在种植体位置(上颌骨与下颌骨;P=.341)和所用固定器类型(P=.630)之间没有观察到显著差异。种植体MBL在1年时大于0.5 mm,之后显示出显著更高的MBL(P<.001)。夹板种植体调查牙冠显示上颌骨的MBL较低(夹板种植体与非夹板种植体;P=.037)治疗后观察到美观/功能改善,但基于植入位置(上颌骨与下颌骨)的美观结果没有显著差异。下颌骨植入物的功能改善明显大于上颌骨植入物(P=0.002)。IC-RPD的修复并发症并不常见。然而,60颗基牙中有2颗失败。在IC RPD中,基牙的骨损失低于植入物的MBL(P=0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信