The Americans With Disabilities Act and the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Intersection, Divergence, and the Path Forward

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Joan E. West, Virginia L. McLaughlin, K. Shepherd, Rebecca Cokley
{"title":"The Americans With Disabilities Act and the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Intersection, Divergence, and the Path Forward","authors":"Joan E. West, Virginia L. McLaughlin, K. Shepherd, Rebecca Cokley","doi":"10.1177/10442073221114113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 30th anniversary of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) offered an opportunity for reflection on ways that ADA has influenced—and might further shape—the provision of special education under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), now in its 47th year of implementation. After reviewing the purposes, provisions, and contexts of the two laws, the authors discuss the interplay between IDEA and ADA within several important areas, including the delivery of student services, creation of system-wide frameworks, focus on postsecondary outcomes, and programs in higher education. The authors then consider three factors that create tensions for the ways in which IDEA currently defines disability and addresses student needs: changing demographics in public schools, standards-based reform in education, and the growth of disability rights and activism. The article concludes with recommendations for moving ahead by deepening and expanding the dialogue between special education and the disability rights communities; amplifying the voices of graduates of IDEA; engaging leadership of independent federal advisory agencies to infuse ADA principles into IDEA; and exploring international thinking, scholarship, and practice related to serving all students effectively and inclusively.","PeriodicalId":46868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disability Policy Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disability Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221114113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 30th anniversary of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) offered an opportunity for reflection on ways that ADA has influenced—and might further shape—the provision of special education under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), now in its 47th year of implementation. After reviewing the purposes, provisions, and contexts of the two laws, the authors discuss the interplay between IDEA and ADA within several important areas, including the delivery of student services, creation of system-wide frameworks, focus on postsecondary outcomes, and programs in higher education. The authors then consider three factors that create tensions for the ways in which IDEA currently defines disability and addresses student needs: changing demographics in public schools, standards-based reform in education, and the growth of disability rights and activism. The article concludes with recommendations for moving ahead by deepening and expanding the dialogue between special education and the disability rights communities; amplifying the voices of graduates of IDEA; engaging leadership of independent federal advisory agencies to infuse ADA principles into IDEA; and exploring international thinking, scholarship, and practice related to serving all students effectively and inclusively.
《美国残疾人法案》和《残疾人教育法:交集、分歧和前进之路》
《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)颁布30周年提供了一个机会,让我们反思ADA对《残疾人教育法案》(IDEA)下的特殊教育的影响,并可能进一步影响该法案的实施,该法案目前已实施47年。在回顾了这两项法律的目的、条款和背景后,作者讨论了IDEA和ADA在几个重要领域的相互作用,包括提供学生服务、创建全系统框架、关注中学后教育成果和高等教育计划。然后,作者考虑了三个因素,这些因素对IDEA目前定义残疾和解决学生需求的方式造成了紧张:公立学校人口结构的变化、基于标准的教育改革,以及残疾权利和行动主义的发展。文章最后提出了通过深化和扩大特殊教育与残疾人权利团体之间的对话来推进的建议;扩大IDEA毕业生的声音;让独立联邦咨询机构的领导层参与,将ADA原则融入IDEA;探索有效和包容地为所有学生服务的国际思维、学术和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Disability Policy Studies addresses compelling, variable issues in ethics, policy, and law related to individuals with disabilities. A major focus is quantitative and qualitative policy research. Articles have implications in fields such as education, law, sociology, public health, family studies, medicine, social work, and public administration. Occasional special series discuss current problems or areas needing more in-depth research, for example, disability and aging, policy concerning families of children with disabilities, oppression and disability, school violence policies and interventions, and systems change in supporting individuals with disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信