Comparative analysis of endophyte diversity of Dendrobium officinale lived on rock and tree.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Xiaolan Li, Huan Hu, Qunli Ren, Miao Wang, Yimei Du, Yuqi He, Qian Wang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of endophyte diversity of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> lived on rock and tree.","authors":"Xiaolan Li, Huan Hu, Qunli Ren, Miao Wang, Yimei Du, Yuqi He, Qian Wang","doi":"10.5511/plantbiotechnology.23.0208a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Dendrobium officinale</i> usually lives on rock or tree, but their endophyte diversity has not yet been fully revealed? In this study, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the endophyte diversity of the roots of <i>D. officinale</i> lived on tree (Group 1-3, arboreal type) and rock (Group 4, lithophytic type). The results showed that their composition of endophytic fungi and bacteria were similar at phylum level, while their relative abundance were different. Their taxa composition and abundance of endophytes differed significantly among groups at the genus level. <i>Alpha</i> diversity of endophytic fungi of lithophytic type was higher than those from arboreal type, while there was no advantage in endophytic bacteria. <i>Beta</i> diversity revealed that the endophytic fungi tended to cluster in each group, but the endophytic bacteria were dispersed among the groups. LEfSe analysis found that the numbers of predicted endophyte biomarkers of lithophytic type were more than arboreal types at genus level, and the biomarkers varied among groups. Microbial network analysis revealed similarities and differences in the taxa composition and abundance of shared and special endophytes in each group. These results suggested that the root endophytes of lithophytic and arboreal <i>D. officinale</i> differed in diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20411,"journal":{"name":"Plant Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10804140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.23.0208a","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dendrobium officinale usually lives on rock or tree, but their endophyte diversity has not yet been fully revealed? In this study, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the endophyte diversity of the roots of D. officinale lived on tree (Group 1-3, arboreal type) and rock (Group 4, lithophytic type). The results showed that their composition of endophytic fungi and bacteria were similar at phylum level, while their relative abundance were different. Their taxa composition and abundance of endophytes differed significantly among groups at the genus level. Alpha diversity of endophytic fungi of lithophytic type was higher than those from arboreal type, while there was no advantage in endophytic bacteria. Beta diversity revealed that the endophytic fungi tended to cluster in each group, but the endophytic bacteria were dispersed among the groups. LEfSe analysis found that the numbers of predicted endophyte biomarkers of lithophytic type were more than arboreal types at genus level, and the biomarkers varied among groups. Microbial network analysis revealed similarities and differences in the taxa composition and abundance of shared and special endophytes in each group. These results suggested that the root endophytes of lithophytic and arboreal D. officinale differed in diversity.

石斛与树栖石斛内生菌多样性的比较分析
铁皮石斛通常生活在岩石或树上,但它们的内生菌多样性尚未得到充分揭示?本研究利用高通量测序技术研究了生活在树上(1-3组,树栖型)和岩石上(4组,石栖型)的 officinale 铁皮石斛根系的内生菌多样性。结果表明,它们的内生真菌和细菌的门级组成相似,但相对丰度不同。在属一级,各组内生真菌的类群组成和丰度差异显著。石生型内生真菌的 Alpha 多样性高于树生型内生真菌,而内生细菌则没有优势。Beta 多样性表明,内生真菌倾向于聚集在每个组中,而内生细菌则分散在各组中。LEFSe分析发现,在属一级,石生类型的预测内生菌生物标志物数量多于树生类型,而且各组之间的生物标志物各不相同。微生物网络分析揭示了各组共有内生菌和特殊内生菌在类群组成和丰度上的异同。这些结果表明,石生和树生 D. officinale 的根内生菌在多样性方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Biotechnology
Plant Biotechnology BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-PLANT SCIENCES
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Biotechnology is an international, open-access, and online journal, published every three months by the Japanese Society for Plant Biotechnology. The journal, first published in 1984 as the predecessor journal, “Plant Tissue Culture Letters” and became its present form in 1997 when the society name was renamed to Japanese Society for Plant Cell and Molecular Biology, publishes findings in the areas from basic- to application research of plant biotechnology. The aim of Plant Biotechnology is to publish original and high-impact papers, in the most rapid turnaround time for reviewing, on the plant biotechnology including tissue culture, production of specialized metabolites, transgenic technology, and genome editing technology, and also on the related research fields including molecular biology, cell biology, genetics, plant breeding, plant physiology and biochemistry, metabolic engineering, synthetic biology, and bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信