Lessons Learned from Modeling the Interaction with Conversational Agents

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.55612/s-5002-055-007
Ulisses da Silva Fernandes, Glívia Angélica Rodrigues Barbosa, Bruno Azevedo Chagas, Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, R. Prates
{"title":"Lessons Learned from Modeling the Interaction with Conversational Agents","authors":"Ulisses da Silva Fernandes, Glívia Angélica Rodrigues Barbosa, Bruno Azevedo Chagas, Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, R. Prates","doi":"10.55612/s-5002-055-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intelligent conversational agents have become widespread. Inspired by conversations in natural language, they present different degrees of intelligence and autonomy, bringing challenges for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). One such challenge concerns design languages for modeling user-agent interaction. We focus here on MoLIC, a design-phase dialogue model based on Semiotic Engineering theory devised to represent user-system interactions as conversations. We performed two case studies with MoLIC interaction diagrams representing two conversational agents – the ANA chatbot and Samsung Bixby. We examined how the interactive aspects of these agents could be expressed in MoLIC. Although it was possible to express the general interaction, our results showed limitations related to the language expressiveness or its inadequacy to represent these systems. We identified limitations in the applicability of MoLIC in modeling and pondered on how to extend or adapt it; directing the HCI community to issues and initiatives that can help design and model these technologies.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-055-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intelligent conversational agents have become widespread. Inspired by conversations in natural language, they present different degrees of intelligence and autonomy, bringing challenges for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). One such challenge concerns design languages for modeling user-agent interaction. We focus here on MoLIC, a design-phase dialogue model based on Semiotic Engineering theory devised to represent user-system interactions as conversations. We performed two case studies with MoLIC interaction diagrams representing two conversational agents – the ANA chatbot and Samsung Bixby. We examined how the interactive aspects of these agents could be expressed in MoLIC. Although it was possible to express the general interaction, our results showed limitations related to the language expressiveness or its inadequacy to represent these systems. We identified limitations in the applicability of MoLIC in modeling and pondered on how to extend or adapt it; directing the HCI community to issues and initiatives that can help design and model these technologies.
分享
查看原文
会话代理交互建模的经验教训
智能对话代理已经普及。受自然语言对话的启发,它们表现出不同程度的智能和自主性,给人机交互(HCI)带来了挑战。其中一个挑战涉及用户代理交互建模的设计语言。我们在这里关注MoLIC,这是一种基于符号学工程理论的设计阶段对话模型,旨在将用户-系统交互表示为对话。我们进行了两个案例研究,使用MoLIC交互图表示两个会话代理——ANA聊天机器人和Samsung Bixby。我们研究了这些药物的相互作用方面如何在MoLIC中表达。虽然可以表达一般的交互,但我们的结果显示了与语言表达性相关的局限性,或者它不足以表示这些系统。我们发现了MoLIC在建模中适用性的局限性,并思考了如何扩展或调整它;引导HCI社区关注能够帮助设计和建模这些技术的问题和计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信