3D numerical study and comparison of thermal-flow performance of various annular finned-tube designs

IF 13 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MARINE
Farouk Tahrour , Hijaz Ahmad , Houari Ameur , Tareq Saeed , Hanaa Abu-Zinadah , Younes Menni
{"title":"3D numerical study and comparison of thermal-flow performance of various annular finned-tube designs","authors":"Farouk Tahrour ,&nbsp;Hijaz Ahmad ,&nbsp;Houari Ameur ,&nbsp;Tareq Saeed ,&nbsp;Hanaa Abu-Zinadah ,&nbsp;Younes Menni","doi":"10.1016/j.joes.2022.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increase of heat transfer problems in marine vehicles and submerged power stations in oceans, the search for an efficient finned-tube heat exchanger has become particularly important. The purpose of the present investigation is to analyze and compare the thermal exchange and flow characteristics between five different fin designs, namely: a concentric circular finned-tube (CCFT), an eccentric circular finned-tube (ECFT), a perforated circular finned-tube (PCFT), a serrated circular finned-tube (SCFT), and a star-shaped finned-tube (S-SFT). The fin design and spacing impact on the thermal-flow performance of a heat exchanger was computed at Reynolds numbers varying from 4,300 to 15,000. From the numerical results, and when the fin spacing has been changed from 2 to 7 mm, an enhancement in the Colburn factor and a reduction in the friction factor and fin performances were observed for all cases under study. Three criteria were checked to select the most efficient fin design: the performance evaluation criterion <em>P<sub>EC</sub></em>, the global performance criterion <em>G</em><sub>PC,</sub> and the mass global performance criterion<span><math><msub><mi>M</mi><msub><mi>G</mi><mrow><mi>P</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow></msub></msub></math></span>. Whatever the value of Reynolds number, the conventional CCFT provided the lowest performance evaluation criterion <em>P</em><sub>EC</sub>, while the SCFT gave the highest amount of <em>P</em><sub>EC</sub>. The most significant value of <em>G</em><sub>PC</sub> was reached with the ECFT; however, <em>G</em><sub>PC</sub> remained almost the same for CCFT, PCFT, SCFT, and S-SFT. In terms of the mass global performance criterion, the S-SFT provides the highest <span><math><msub><mi>M</mi><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>as compared with the full fins of CCFT (41–73% higher) and ECFT (29–54% higher). Thus, the heat exchanger with S-SFT is recommended to be used in the cooling of offshore energy systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48514,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 294-307"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468013322000407","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

With the increase of heat transfer problems in marine vehicles and submerged power stations in oceans, the search for an efficient finned-tube heat exchanger has become particularly important. The purpose of the present investigation is to analyze and compare the thermal exchange and flow characteristics between five different fin designs, namely: a concentric circular finned-tube (CCFT), an eccentric circular finned-tube (ECFT), a perforated circular finned-tube (PCFT), a serrated circular finned-tube (SCFT), and a star-shaped finned-tube (S-SFT). The fin design and spacing impact on the thermal-flow performance of a heat exchanger was computed at Reynolds numbers varying from 4,300 to 15,000. From the numerical results, and when the fin spacing has been changed from 2 to 7 mm, an enhancement in the Colburn factor and a reduction in the friction factor and fin performances were observed for all cases under study. Three criteria were checked to select the most efficient fin design: the performance evaluation criterion PEC, the global performance criterion GPC, and the mass global performance criterionMGPC. Whatever the value of Reynolds number, the conventional CCFT provided the lowest performance evaluation criterion PEC, while the SCFT gave the highest amount of PEC. The most significant value of GPC was reached with the ECFT; however, GPC remained almost the same for CCFT, PCFT, SCFT, and S-SFT. In terms of the mass global performance criterion, the S-SFT provides the highest MGpcas compared with the full fins of CCFT (41–73% higher) and ECFT (29–54% higher). Thus, the heat exchanger with S-SFT is recommended to be used in the cooling of offshore energy systems.

不同环形翅片管设计热流性能的三维数值研究与比较
随着船舶和海洋水下电站中传热问题的增加,寻找一种高效的翅片管换热器变得尤为重要。本研究的目的是分析和比较五种不同翅片设计,即同心圆形翅片管(CCFT)、偏心圆形翅片管(ECFT)、穿孔圆形翅片管(PCFT)、锯齿形圆形翅片管(SCFT)和星形翅片管(S-SFT)之间的热交换和流动特性。计算了雷诺数为4300 ~ 15000时翅片设计和间距对换热器热流性能的影响。从数值结果来看,当翅片间距从2 mm变为7 mm时,在研究的所有情况下都观察到科尔本系数的增强和摩擦系数和翅片性能的降低。通过性能评价标准PEC、整体性能标准GPC和质量整体性能标准mgpc三个标准来选择最有效的翅片设计。无论雷诺数是多少,常规CCFT提供的性能评价标准PEC最低,而SCFT提供的PEC最高。GPC值以ECFT值最为显著;然而,CCFT、PCFT、SCFT和S-SFT的GPC几乎保持不变。在质量整体性能标准方面,S-SFT提供了最高的MGpcas,相比全鳍的CCFT(高41-73%)和ECFT(高29-54%)。因此,建议将S-SFT换热器用于海上能源系统的冷却。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
19.70%
发文量
224
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science (JOES) serves as a platform for disseminating original research and advancements in the realm of ocean engineering and science. JOES encourages the submission of papers covering various aspects of ocean engineering and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信