Janet Sucha, E. Roberts, Brandie Buckless, Lisa Richidt, Diana Bigby, Dana Kingfisher
{"title":"Partnering on the Evaluation of the Montana Tribal Tobacco Program: The Story of a Successful State-Tribal Collaboration","authors":"Janet Sucha, E. Roberts, Brandie Buckless, Lisa Richidt, Diana Bigby, Dana Kingfisher","doi":"10.35844/001c.25446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities have historically been subject to unethical research and evaluation practices imposed upon them by outsiders. Given this history and the often, strained relationships between state and tribal governments, tribes can be hesitant to work with and trust state agencies to conduct research and evaluation in their communities. This paper shares a collaborative process undertaken by the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, American Indian Tobacco Prevention Specialists, and James Bell Associates, Inc., to successfully develop and implement a locally meaningful evaluation project. Together, we designed a culturally responsive evaluation study to examine the impact of the Montana Tobacco Use Prevention Program being implemented in tribal and urban Indian communities. We co-authored this paper to ensure the perspectives of all three groups were represented. We share lessons learned and recommendations for state agencies, tribes, and urban Indian organizations seeking to evaluate tribal public health programs.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.25446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities have historically been subject to unethical research and evaluation practices imposed upon them by outsiders. Given this history and the often, strained relationships between state and tribal governments, tribes can be hesitant to work with and trust state agencies to conduct research and evaluation in their communities. This paper shares a collaborative process undertaken by the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, American Indian Tobacco Prevention Specialists, and James Bell Associates, Inc., to successfully develop and implement a locally meaningful evaluation project. Together, we designed a culturally responsive evaluation study to examine the impact of the Montana Tobacco Use Prevention Program being implemented in tribal and urban Indian communities. We co-authored this paper to ensure the perspectives of all three groups were represented. We share lessons learned and recommendations for state agencies, tribes, and urban Indian organizations seeking to evaluate tribal public health programs.
美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)社区历来受到外来者强加给他们的不道德的研究和评估做法的影响。鉴于这段历史以及州政府和部落政府之间经常紧张的关系,部落可能会犹豫是否与州机构合作并信任州机构在其社区进行研究和评估。本文分享了蒙大拿州公共卫生与公众服务部、美国印第安烟草预防专家和James Bell Associates,股份有限公司为成功开发和实施当地有意义的评估项目而进行的合作过程。我们共同设计了一项文化响应性评估研究,以考察蒙大拿州烟草使用预防计划在部落和城市印第安人社区实施的影响。我们共同撰写了这篇论文,以确保所有三个群体的观点都得到了体现。我们为寻求评估部落公共卫生计划的国家机构、部落和印度城市组织分享经验教训和建议。