Gender differences in self-efficacy partially explain the female underprediction effect

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Tyler L. Minnigh, Thomas R. Coyle
{"title":"Gender differences in self-efficacy partially explain the female underprediction effect","authors":"Tyler L. Minnigh,&nbsp;Thomas R. Coyle","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Women tend to perform better in college than their admission test scores predict. The observed differential prediction of men's and women's academic performance<span> based on academic tests is known as the female underprediction effect. Prior research demonstrates that gender differences in trait-level conscientiousness explain some of the observed female underprediction effect. The current study examined the effects of the facets of conscientiousness (i.e., self-efficacy, orderliness, dutifulness, achievement-striving, self-discipline, and cautiousness) in mediation analyses which were expected to partially explain the relationship between gender and academic performance after controlling for test scores. The results show that the relationship between gender and GPA is mediated by trait-level conscientiousness and, more specifically, that the effect is mediated by the facet of self-efficacy.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 104385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656623000478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Women tend to perform better in college than their admission test scores predict. The observed differential prediction of men's and women's academic performance based on academic tests is known as the female underprediction effect. Prior research demonstrates that gender differences in trait-level conscientiousness explain some of the observed female underprediction effect. The current study examined the effects of the facets of conscientiousness (i.e., self-efficacy, orderliness, dutifulness, achievement-striving, self-discipline, and cautiousness) in mediation analyses which were expected to partially explain the relationship between gender and academic performance after controlling for test scores. The results show that the relationship between gender and GPA is mediated by trait-level conscientiousness and, more specifically, that the effect is mediated by the facet of self-efficacy.

自我效能感的性别差异部分解释了女性预测不足效应
女性在大学里的表现往往比入学考试成绩预测的要好。观察到的基于学业测试对男性和女性学习成绩的差异预测被称为女性预测不足效应。先前的研究表明,特质水平尽责性的性别差异解释了一些观察到的女性预测不足效应。目前的研究在中介分析中检验了尽责性的各个方面(即自我效能感、有序性、尽职尽责、努力成就、自律和谨慎性)的影响,这些方面有望在控制考试成绩后部分解释性别与学习成绩之间的关系。结果表明,性别与GPA之间的关系是由特质水平的尽责性介导的,更具体地说,这种影响是由自我效能方面介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信