Ethical mental health practice in diverse cultures and races

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
W. Kung, S. Johansson
{"title":"Ethical mental health practice in diverse cultures and races","authors":"W. Kung, S. Johansson","doi":"10.1080/15313204.2022.2070889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Drawing from Beauchamp and Childress’s four ethical principles as an overarching framework, integrating them with the NASW’s code of ethics, we examine their intersection with cultural diversity and antiracism, and its implications for mental health practice. We argue that self-determination in collective cultures may involve inclusivity beyond individual clients. Beneficence is culturally defined and evidence-based practices proven effective for some clientele have to be considered together with clients. For non-maleficence, practitioners need to reduce biases and microaggressions to avoid harming clients. Finally, justice is attainable when antiracist approaches are in place and those marginalized have equitable access to culturally-sensitive services.","PeriodicalId":45824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work","volume":"31 1","pages":"248 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2022.2070889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing from Beauchamp and Childress’s four ethical principles as an overarching framework, integrating them with the NASW’s code of ethics, we examine their intersection with cultural diversity and antiracism, and its implications for mental health practice. We argue that self-determination in collective cultures may involve inclusivity beyond individual clients. Beneficence is culturally defined and evidence-based practices proven effective for some clientele have to be considered together with clients. For non-maleficence, practitioners need to reduce biases and microaggressions to avoid harming clients. Finally, justice is attainable when antiracist approaches are in place and those marginalized have equitable access to culturally-sensitive services.
不同文化和种族的道德心理健康实践
摘要以波尚和蔡尔德里斯的四项伦理原则为总体框架,将其与美国全国妇女协会的伦理准则相结合,我们研究了它们与文化多样性和反种族主义的交叉点,及其对心理健康实践的影响。我们认为,集体文化中的自决可能涉及个人客户之外的包容性。福利是文化定义的,证明对某些客户有效的循证实践必须与客户一起考虑。对于非恶意行为,从业者需要减少偏见和微侵犯,以避免伤害客户。最后,当反种族主义的做法到位,那些被边缘化的人能够公平地获得对文化敏感的服务时,正义是可以实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work® is dedicated to the examina­tion of multicultural social issues as they relate to social work policy, research, theory, and practice. The journal helps readers develop knowledge and promote understanding of the impact of culture, ethnicity, and class on the individual, group, organization, and community on the delivery of human services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信