Telehealth Psychoeducational Groups With Latinx College Students: Findings From Focus Groups.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Elizabeth Terrazas-Carrillo, Ediza Garcia, Krista Rodriguez, Adriana Malagon, Mitzy Gonzalez, Saliha Garcia
{"title":"Telehealth Psychoeducational Groups With Latinx College Students: Findings From Focus Groups.","authors":"Elizabeth Terrazas-Carrillo, Ediza Garcia, Krista Rodriguez, Adriana Malagon, Mitzy Gonzalez, Saliha Garcia","doi":"10.1080/00207284.2022.2159414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The literatures examining psychoeducational groups and telehealth services have demonstrated positive results but less is known about the efficacy of psychoeducational telehealth groups. This study examines the perspectives of 105 Latinx college students who participated in an 8-session psychoeducational group via a telehealth platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research questions included (a) What was the experience of these Latinx college students participating in telehealth psychoeducational groups? and (b) What were the potential perceived advantages and disadvantages of implementing telehealth psychoeducational groups? Postintervention, a total of 16 focus groups were convened with a total of 105 Latinx college students (average number of participants per group = 6). Interviews were coded using conventional qualitative analysis and yielded four main themes: (1) group cohesion, which involved group members feeling that they were connected and that the group was a safe space; (2) group leaders, which involved leaders' preparation and knowledge and their ability to foster a safe environment); (3) cultural issues, which involved cultural values and acculturative and first-generation stress.; and (4) telehealth implementation, wherein participants described advantages and disadvantages of the telehealth approach. We discuss study limitations and directions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46441,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Group Psychotherapy","volume":"73 1","pages":"75-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Group Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2022.2159414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literatures examining psychoeducational groups and telehealth services have demonstrated positive results but less is known about the efficacy of psychoeducational telehealth groups. This study examines the perspectives of 105 Latinx college students who participated in an 8-session psychoeducational group via a telehealth platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research questions included (a) What was the experience of these Latinx college students participating in telehealth psychoeducational groups? and (b) What were the potential perceived advantages and disadvantages of implementing telehealth psychoeducational groups? Postintervention, a total of 16 focus groups were convened with a total of 105 Latinx college students (average number of participants per group = 6). Interviews were coded using conventional qualitative analysis and yielded four main themes: (1) group cohesion, which involved group members feeling that they were connected and that the group was a safe space; (2) group leaders, which involved leaders' preparation and knowledge and their ability to foster a safe environment); (3) cultural issues, which involved cultural values and acculturative and first-generation stress.; and (4) telehealth implementation, wherein participants described advantages and disadvantages of the telehealth approach. We discuss study limitations and directions for future research.

拉丁裔大学生远程健康心理教育小组的研究结果
研究心理教育团体和远程医疗服务的文献已经证明了积极的结果,但对远程心理教育团体的疗效知之甚少。本研究考察了在COVID-19大流行期间通过远程医疗平台参加8次心理教育小组的105名拉丁裔大学生的观点。研究问题包括(a)这些拉丁裔大学生参加远程保健心理教育小组的经历是什么?(b)实施远程保健心理教育小组的潜在优势和劣势是什么?干预后,共召集16个焦点小组,共105名拉丁裔大学生(每组平均参与人数为6人)。访谈使用传统的定性分析进行编码,并得出四个主要主题:(1)群体凝聚力,这涉及到群体成员感觉他们是相互联系的,群体是一个安全的空间;(2)群体领导者,这涉及领导者的准备和知识以及他们营造安全环境的能力);(3)文化问题,涉及文化价值观、异文化和第一代压力;(4)远程医疗实施,其中参与者描述了远程医疗方法的优点和缺点。讨论了研究的局限性和未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading source of information on group therapy theory, practice, and research, this journal features contributions from foremost experts in the field. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy offers: - Clinical articles on group treatment models, process issues, and techniques - Research reviews that keep practitioners up to date - Thought-provoking essays in the Reader"s Forum and Commentary sections - Reviews of current books and video releases - Special issues on such topics as evidence-based practice and ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信