Strategies for regional modeling of surface mass balance at the Monte Sarmiento Massif, Tierra del Fuego

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Cryosphere Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI:10.5194/tc-17-2343-2023
Franziska Temme, David Farías-Barahona, T. Seehaus, R. Jaña, J. Arigony-Neto, I. González, A. Arndt, T. Sauter, C. Schneider, J. Fürst
{"title":"Strategies for regional modeling of surface mass balance at the Monte Sarmiento Massif, Tierra del Fuego","authors":"Franziska Temme, David Farías-Barahona, T. Seehaus, R. Jaña, J. Arigony-Neto, I. González, A. Arndt, T. Sauter, C. Schneider, J. Fürst","doi":"10.5194/tc-17-2343-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study investigates strategies for calibration of surface mass balance (SMB) models in the Monte Sarmiento Massif (MSM), Tierra del Fuego, with the goal of achieving realistic simulations of the\nregional SMB. Applied calibration strategies range from a local\nsingle-glacier calibration to a regional calibration with the inclusion of a\nsnowdrift parameterization. We apply four SMB models of different complexity. In this way, we examine the model transferability in space, the benefit of regional mass change observations and the advantage of increasing the\ncomplexity level regarding included processes. Measurements include ablation\nand ice thickness observations at Schiaparelli Glacier as well as elevation\nchanges and flow velocity from satellite data for the entire study site.\nPerformance of simulated SMB is validated against geodetic mass changes and\nstake observations of surface melting. Results show that transferring SMB\nmodels in space is a challenge, and common practices can produce distinctly\nbiased estimates. Model performance can be significantly improved by the use\nof remotely sensed regional observations. Furthermore, we have shown that\nsnowdrift does play an important role in the SMB in the Cordillera Darwin, where strong and consistent winds prevail. The massif-wide average annual\nSMB between 2000 and 2022 falls between −0.28 and −0.07 m w.e. yr−1,\ndepending on the applied model. The SMB is mainly controlled by surface\nmelting and snowfall. The model intercomparison does not indicate one\nobviously best-suited model for SMB simulations in the MSM.\n","PeriodicalId":56315,"journal":{"name":"Cryosphere","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cryosphere","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2343-2023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. This study investigates strategies for calibration of surface mass balance (SMB) models in the Monte Sarmiento Massif (MSM), Tierra del Fuego, with the goal of achieving realistic simulations of the regional SMB. Applied calibration strategies range from a local single-glacier calibration to a regional calibration with the inclusion of a snowdrift parameterization. We apply four SMB models of different complexity. In this way, we examine the model transferability in space, the benefit of regional mass change observations and the advantage of increasing the complexity level regarding included processes. Measurements include ablation and ice thickness observations at Schiaparelli Glacier as well as elevation changes and flow velocity from satellite data for the entire study site. Performance of simulated SMB is validated against geodetic mass changes and stake observations of surface melting. Results show that transferring SMB models in space is a challenge, and common practices can produce distinctly biased estimates. Model performance can be significantly improved by the use of remotely sensed regional observations. Furthermore, we have shown that snowdrift does play an important role in the SMB in the Cordillera Darwin, where strong and consistent winds prevail. The massif-wide average annual SMB between 2000 and 2022 falls between −0.28 and −0.07 m w.e. yr−1, depending on the applied model. The SMB is mainly controlled by surface melting and snowfall. The model intercomparison does not indicate one obviously best-suited model for SMB simulations in the MSM.
火地岛萨米恩托山地表物质平衡区域模拟策略
摘要本研究探讨了火地岛萨米恩托山(MSM)地表质量平衡(SMB)模型的校准策略,目的是实现区域SMB的真实模拟。应用的校准策略包括从局部单一冰川校准到包含雪流参数化的区域校准。我们应用了四种不同复杂程度的SMB模型。通过这种方式,我们研究了模式在空间上的可转移性、区域质量变化观测的好处以及增加包含过程的复杂性水平的好处。测量包括在斯基亚帕雷利冰川的消融和冰厚观测,以及整个研究地点的卫星数据的海拔变化和流速。通过大地质量变化和地面熔化观测,验证了模拟SMB的性能。结果表明,在空间中转移smb模型是一个挑战,并且通常的做法会产生明显的偏差估计。利用遥感区域观测资料可以显著提高模型性能。此外,我们已经证明,在达尔文科迪勒拉地区的SMB中,雪堆确实起着重要作用,在那里,强风和持续的风盛行。2000年至2022年间,整个地块的年平均smb在−0.28至−0.07米之间。yr−1,取决于应用的模型。SMB主要受地表融化和降雪控制。模型间比较并没有显示出一个明显最适合MSM中SMB模拟的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cryosphere
Cryosphere GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.30%
发文量
240
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cryosphere (TC) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of frozen water and ground on Earth and on other planetary bodies. The main subject areas are the following: ice sheets and glaciers; planetary ice bodies; permafrost and seasonally frozen ground; seasonal snow cover; sea ice; river and lake ice; remote sensing, numerical modelling, in situ and laboratory studies of the above and including studies of the interaction of the cryosphere with the rest of the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信