Comparison of Efficacy of Nortriptyline Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Painful Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Diabetes

Q4 Medicine
Mehrnoosh Zakerkish, Davood Raeisi, Shahram Rafie, M. Yazdi, Zahra Kosarian, Shirin Rahimzadeh Telegrafchi, Saeed Hesam
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy of Nortriptyline Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Painful Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Diabetes","authors":"Mehrnoosh Zakerkish, Davood Raeisi, Shahram Rafie, M. Yazdi, Zahra Kosarian, Shirin Rahimzadeh Telegrafchi, Saeed Hesam","doi":"10.2478/rjdnmd-2019-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and aims: Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is one of the most common complications of diabetes and is difficult to treat. Existing treatments are often inadequate at controlling pain and limited by side-effects and drug tolerance. This study assessed the efficacy of nortriptyline versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in patients with DPNP. Material and method: This is a randomized clinical trial study conducted on 39 patients with DPNP referring to Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz in 2017. Patients were randomly treated with TENS (18 sessions, each session 30 minutes; n=20) or nortriptyline (25 to 75 mg, once daily; n=19) for 6 weeks. Patients were evaluated for side effects and pain relief using visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There was a significant improvement in pain with both treatments compared with baseline (p˂0.001). The patients in nortriptyline group experienced more pain relief (7.21±1.51 to 0.84±1.34) than the TENS group (7.6±1.47 to 2.75 ±2.43) (P=0.001). The 50% pain relief was observed in 14 patients (73%) in nortriptyline group, 6 patients (30%) in TENS group. Moreover, the side effects were seen in 15% of TENS and 55% of patients in nortriptyline groups (P=0.019). Conclusion: Both TENS and nortriptyline were effective and safe in the management of DPNP. But nortriptyline showed a better performance on pain relief.","PeriodicalId":38700,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases","volume":"26 1","pages":"401 - 411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjdnmd-2019-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims: Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is one of the most common complications of diabetes and is difficult to treat. Existing treatments are often inadequate at controlling pain and limited by side-effects and drug tolerance. This study assessed the efficacy of nortriptyline versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in patients with DPNP. Material and method: This is a randomized clinical trial study conducted on 39 patients with DPNP referring to Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz in 2017. Patients were randomly treated with TENS (18 sessions, each session 30 minutes; n=20) or nortriptyline (25 to 75 mg, once daily; n=19) for 6 weeks. Patients were evaluated for side effects and pain relief using visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There was a significant improvement in pain with both treatments compared with baseline (p˂0.001). The patients in nortriptyline group experienced more pain relief (7.21±1.51 to 0.84±1.34) than the TENS group (7.6±1.47 to 2.75 ±2.43) (P=0.001). The 50% pain relief was observed in 14 patients (73%) in nortriptyline group, 6 patients (30%) in TENS group. Moreover, the side effects were seen in 15% of TENS and 55% of patients in nortriptyline groups (P=0.019). Conclusion: Both TENS and nortriptyline were effective and safe in the management of DPNP. But nortriptyline showed a better performance on pain relief.
去甲替林与经皮神经电刺激治疗糖尿病患者疼痛性周围神经病变的疗效比较
摘要背景与目的:糖尿病周围神经性疼痛(DPNP)是糖尿病最常见的并发症之一,治疗难度大。现有的治疗方法往往不足以控制疼痛,并且受到副作用和药物耐受性的限制。本研究评估了去甲替林与经皮神经电刺激(TENS)对DPNP患者的疗效。材料和方法:这是一项随机临床试验研究,于2017年在阿瓦兹的Golestan医院对39名DPNP患者进行。患者随机接受TENS(18次,每次30分钟;n=20)或去甲替林(25至75 mg,每天一次;n=19)治疗6周。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的副作用和疼痛缓解情况。结果:与基线相比,两种治疗的疼痛均有显著改善(p 0.001)。去甲替林组患者的疼痛缓解程度(7.21±1.51至0.84±1.34)高于TENS组(7.6±1.47至2.75±2.43)(p=0.001)。此外,去甲替林组15%的TENS和55%的患者出现副作用(P=0.019)。但去甲替林在止痛方面表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信