Effects of rhetorical text analysis on idea generation and text quality

IF 2.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Phuong Nam T. Nguyen, Gert Rijlaarsdam, T. Janssen, W. Admiraal
{"title":"Effects of rhetorical text analysis on idea generation and text quality","authors":"Phuong Nam T. Nguyen, Gert Rijlaarsdam, T. Janssen, W. Admiraal","doi":"10.1075/ITL.16013.RIJ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Producing a meaningful written discourse in a foreign language requires a high cognitive effort of EFL learners.\n They face challenges caused by L2 word or grammar-related difficulties, and also by the L2 genre and genre conventions that may be\n quite different from what they experienced in their L1. The present study focusses on the support offered to Vietnamese L2 writers\n to overcome these hindrances. An intensive four-week writing intervention was designed and tested to examine whether encouraging\n genre awareness via a short session of sample text analysis could empower students to conduct effective brainstorming for\n argumentative writing. In a pre-test post-test control group design with switching replications, with 66 EFL intermediate\n undergraduate participants, the study obtained four indicators of L2 argumentative writing quality: idea generation, productivity,\n global text quality and self-efficacy. The results showed that participants integrated the sample text analysis into the idea\n generation stage. They created significantly longer self-expressive free writing texts, perceived the generated ideas as more\n useful, and used more of these ideas in their argumentative texts composition, compared to students from the control condition\n (with teacher instruction only). No treatment effects were found for productivity, global quality of final text, and\n self-efficacy. Students in both control and treatment conditions generally showed a significant improvement on these\n variables.","PeriodicalId":53175,"journal":{"name":"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ITL.16013.RIJ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Producing a meaningful written discourse in a foreign language requires a high cognitive effort of EFL learners. They face challenges caused by L2 word or grammar-related difficulties, and also by the L2 genre and genre conventions that may be quite different from what they experienced in their L1. The present study focusses on the support offered to Vietnamese L2 writers to overcome these hindrances. An intensive four-week writing intervention was designed and tested to examine whether encouraging genre awareness via a short session of sample text analysis could empower students to conduct effective brainstorming for argumentative writing. In a pre-test post-test control group design with switching replications, with 66 EFL intermediate undergraduate participants, the study obtained four indicators of L2 argumentative writing quality: idea generation, productivity, global text quality and self-efficacy. The results showed that participants integrated the sample text analysis into the idea generation stage. They created significantly longer self-expressive free writing texts, perceived the generated ideas as more useful, and used more of these ideas in their argumentative texts composition, compared to students from the control condition (with teacher instruction only). No treatment effects were found for productivity, global quality of final text, and self-efficacy. Students in both control and treatment conditions generally showed a significant improvement on these variables.
修辞语篇分析对思想产生和语篇质量的影响
用外语写出有意义的书面语篇需要学习者付出很大的认知努力。他们面临着由第二语言词汇或语法相关的困难引起的挑战,也面临着第二语言体裁和体裁惯例可能与他们在第一语言中所经历的大不相同的挑战。本研究的重点是为越南语第二语言作者提供支持以克服这些障碍。设计并测试了一项为期四周的密集写作干预,以检查通过短时间的样本文本分析来鼓励体裁意识是否能使学生在议论文写作中进行有效的头脑风暴。本研究采用前测后测对照设计,以66名英语中级本科生为研究对象,获得了二语议论文写作质量的四个指标:创意生成、生产力、整体文本质量和自我效能。结果表明,参与者将样本文本分析整合到创意生成阶段。与对照组(只有老师指导)的学生相比,他们创作了更长的自我表达的自由写作文本,认为产生的想法更有用,并在他们的议论文写作中使用了更多的这些想法。没有发现治疗对生产力、最终文本的整体质量和自我效能有影响。对照组和实验组的学生在这些变量上普遍表现出显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium) Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信