With a little help from my friends: Changes in symptoms, cognitions and self-ambivalence after a group based cognitive-behavioral treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Richard Moulding , Maja Nedeljkovic , Sunil Bhar , Jeromy Anglim , Stephanie Fernandez , Michael Kyrios
{"title":"With a little help from my friends: Changes in symptoms, cognitions and self-ambivalence after a group based cognitive-behavioral treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Richard Moulding ,&nbsp;Maja Nedeljkovic ,&nbsp;Sunil Bhar ,&nbsp;Jeromy Anglim ,&nbsp;Stephanie Fernandez ,&nbsp;Michael Kyrios","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Obsessive Compulsive Disorder<span> (OCD) is a debilitating illness affecting 2% of the population. Psychological treatments consisting of exposure and response prevention (ERP) and cognitive behavioral based methods are efficacious for most individuals with OCD and have been found to yield long-term positive outcomes. Most research on such outcomes have focused on individual treatment and the outcomes associated with group-based treatments are less well established. Further, the mechanisms that account for outcomes of individual and group based treatments for OCD remain unclear. </span></span>Cognitive theories<span> suggest that changes in cognitive structures including self-related beliefs may account for treatment related changes, yet limited research has empirically examined such suggestions. This study examined the outcomes of a low-intensity 10-session group CBT program for OCD in real-world effectiveness. The final sample consisted of 78 participants (</span></span><em>M = 34.9</em> years, 50% Males), who answered symptom and cognition measures following each session. Overall, using hierarchical linear modelling, it was found that the program was effective in reducing symptoms (modelled fall of 7.64 on the YBOCS). In addition, both OCD-relevant beliefs and self-ambivalence also reduced significantly, and both significantly related to symptom level. Implications are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364923000441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a debilitating illness affecting 2% of the population. Psychological treatments consisting of exposure and response prevention (ERP) and cognitive behavioral based methods are efficacious for most individuals with OCD and have been found to yield long-term positive outcomes. Most research on such outcomes have focused on individual treatment and the outcomes associated with group-based treatments are less well established. Further, the mechanisms that account for outcomes of individual and group based treatments for OCD remain unclear. Cognitive theories suggest that changes in cognitive structures including self-related beliefs may account for treatment related changes, yet limited research has empirically examined such suggestions. This study examined the outcomes of a low-intensity 10-session group CBT program for OCD in real-world effectiveness. The final sample consisted of 78 participants (M = 34.9 years, 50% Males), who answered symptom and cognition measures following each session. Overall, using hierarchical linear modelling, it was found that the program was effective in reducing symptoms (modelled fall of 7.64 on the YBOCS). In addition, both OCD-relevant beliefs and self-ambivalence also reduced significantly, and both significantly related to symptom level. Implications are discussed.

在我朋友的一点帮助下:在对强迫症进行基于群体的认知行为治疗后,症状、认知和自我矛盾心理的变化
强迫症是一种影响2%人口的衰弱性疾病。由暴露和反应预防(ERP)和基于认知行为的方法组成的心理治疗对大多数强迫症患者有效,并已被发现能产生长期的积极结果。大多数关于此类结果的研究都集中在个体治疗上,而与基于群体的治疗相关的结果则不太确定。此外,解释基于个体和群体的强迫症治疗结果的机制尚不清楚。认知理论表明,包括自我相关信念在内的认知结构的变化可能是治疗相关变化的原因,但有限的研究对这些建议进行了实证检验。这项研究考察了低强度10节课小组强迫症CBT项目在现实世界中的有效性。最终样本包括78名参与者(M=34.9岁,50%为男性),他们在每次治疗后回答症状和认知测量。总的来说,使用分层线性模型,发现该程序在减少症状方面是有效的(YBOCS上的7.64的模型下降)。此外,强迫症相关信念和自我矛盾心理也显著降低,且均与症状水平显著相关。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信