On the Concept of Originality in Scientific Studies

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ilknur Demirtas, K. Gedik, Nuray Gedik, Zehra Yiğit Avdan
{"title":"On the Concept of Originality in Scientific Studies","authors":"Ilknur Demirtas, K. Gedik, Nuray Gedik, Zehra Yiğit Avdan","doi":"10.2399/yod.23.1169711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of what originality means and how it should be addressed in scientific studies has been a controversial and much disputed subject. It is very difficult to come up with a clear and common definition and conceptualization of originality and to discuss such an intangible subject in the context of all scientific fields. In order for researchers and academics to engage in sustainable R&D activities, originality must be well understood and measurably reflected. This study aims to reveal how the concept of originality has been addressed conceptually in the literature. The keywords related to the subject were filtered with Boolean operators and queried in the academic databases of “Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Akademik, Microsoft Academic, TR Index” and academic social networks of “Researchgate, Quora, Edigate Insights”. The results show that due to the variation in the topics, approaches and methodologies within different disciplines, the concept of scientific originality differs from one discipline to another. It is very important to understand the difference between the concepts of creativity, novelty and uniqueness, which are closely related to originality. As such, this study offers clues on originality for researchers.","PeriodicalId":42261,"journal":{"name":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.23.1169711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of what originality means and how it should be addressed in scientific studies has been a controversial and much disputed subject. It is very difficult to come up with a clear and common definition and conceptualization of originality and to discuss such an intangible subject in the context of all scientific fields. In order for researchers and academics to engage in sustainable R&D activities, originality must be well understood and measurably reflected. This study aims to reveal how the concept of originality has been addressed conceptually in the literature. The keywords related to the subject were filtered with Boolean operators and queried in the academic databases of “Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Akademik, Microsoft Academic, TR Index” and academic social networks of “Researchgate, Quora, Edigate Insights”. The results show that due to the variation in the topics, approaches and methodologies within different disciplines, the concept of scientific originality differs from one discipline to another. It is very important to understand the difference between the concepts of creativity, novelty and uniqueness, which are closely related to originality. As such, this study offers clues on originality for researchers.
论科学研究中的原创性概念
原创性意味着什么以及如何在科学研究中解决这一问题一直是一个有争议和争议的话题。很难对独创性提出明确和共同的定义和概念,也很难在所有科学领域的背景下讨论这样一个无形的主题。为了让研究人员和学者参与可持续的研发活动,必须充分理解和可衡量地反映独创性。本研究旨在揭示原创概念在文学中是如何被概念化处理的。使用布尔运算符过滤与主题相关的关键词,并在“Web of Science,Scopus,ScienceDirect,Google Akademik,Microsoft academic,TR Index”的学术数据库和“Researchgate,Quora,Edigate Insights”的学术社交网络中查询。研究结果表明,由于不同学科的主题、方法和方法不同,不同学科的科学原创性概念也不同。理解创造性、新颖性和独特性概念之间的区别是非常重要的,这些概念与独创性密切相关。因此,这项研究为研究人员提供了关于独创性的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yuksekogretim Dergisi
Yuksekogretim Dergisi EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信