MARCADORES DISCURSIVOS EN NIÑOS DE 7 AÑOS CON TRASTORNO ESPECÍFICO DEL LENGUAJE: ESTUDIO DESCRIPTIVO

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
RLA Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.29393/rla58-4samd20004
Sara Asenjo, Rogelio Nazar
{"title":"MARCADORES DISCURSIVOS EN NIÑOS DE 7 AÑOS CON TRASTORNO ESPECÍFICO DEL LENGUAJE: ESTUDIO DESCRIPTIVO","authors":"Sara Asenjo, Rogelio Nazar","doi":"10.29393/rla58-4samd20004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research we describe the use of discourse markers in 25 seven-year-old children diagnosed with specific language impairment (SLI) in contrast with a control group consisting of the same number of typically developing (TD) children of the same age. The motivation is grounded in that cohesion has been indicated as one of the challenging elements for children with this diagnosis, and problems with cohesion can be detrimental for their future academic performance and daily life (Soriano y Contreras, 2012; Buiza, Rodríguez y Adrián, 2015; Pérez, 1997; Acosta, Hernández y Ramírez, 2018). In order to expand the results of previous studies, in the present research we combine quantitative and qualitative perspectives to study the use of discourse markers in a corpus elicited by a story retelling task using a picture book. We analyze the number of discourse markers per text as well as their categories and their coincidence with the markers used in the original story, comparing the results of SLI and TD subjects. We observe no significant difference between the two groups regarding the use of discourse markers. There is only a slightly greater use of coordinating connectors and less coincidence with the markers used in the original story in the case of the SLI group, which is consistent with characteristics of this diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":35168,"journal":{"name":"RLA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29393/rla58-4samd20004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research we describe the use of discourse markers in 25 seven-year-old children diagnosed with specific language impairment (SLI) in contrast with a control group consisting of the same number of typically developing (TD) children of the same age. The motivation is grounded in that cohesion has been indicated as one of the challenging elements for children with this diagnosis, and problems with cohesion can be detrimental for their future academic performance and daily life (Soriano y Contreras, 2012; Buiza, Rodríguez y Adrián, 2015; Pérez, 1997; Acosta, Hernández y Ramírez, 2018). In order to expand the results of previous studies, in the present research we combine quantitative and qualitative perspectives to study the use of discourse markers in a corpus elicited by a story retelling task using a picture book. We analyze the number of discourse markers per text as well as their categories and their coincidence with the markers used in the original story, comparing the results of SLI and TD subjects. We observe no significant difference between the two groups regarding the use of discourse markers. There is only a slightly greater use of coordinating connectors and less coincidence with the markers used in the original story in the case of the SLI group, which is consistent with characteristics of this diagnosis.
7岁特定语言障碍儿童的话语标记物:描述性研究
在这项研究中,我们描述了25名被诊断为特定语言障碍(SLI)的7岁儿童与由相同数量的同龄典型发育(TD)儿童组成的对照组的话语标记的使用情况。这种动机的基础是,凝聚力被认为是患有这种诊断的儿童面临的挑战因素之一,凝聚力问题可能对他们未来的学习成绩和日常生活不利(Soriano y Contreras,2012;Buiza、Rodríguez和Adrián,2015;佩雷斯,1997年;Acosta、Hernández和Ramírez,2018)。为了扩大以往研究的结果,在本研究中,我们结合定量和定性的视角,研究了故事复述任务引发的语料库中话语标记的使用。我们分析了每篇文章中话语标记的数量及其类别,以及它们与原始故事中使用的标记的一致性,并比较了SLI和TD受试者的结果。我们观察到两组在话语标记的使用方面没有显著差异。在SLI组的情况下,协调连接器的使用量略大,与原始报道中使用的标记物的一致性较低,这与该诊断的特征一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RLA
RLA Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信