{"title":"Digital Ethnography: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Angela Delli Paoli, Valentina D’Auria","doi":"10.13136/ISR.V11I4S.434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital ethnography can be defined as a contemporary form of ethnography which considers online social spaces of discussion following the advances in data transmission technology. In the last few years, various attempts of considering online spaces in ethnographic research have been made producing different styles of online ethnography, each identified by a different label. This paper aims to provide a systematic review of the topic to map the practice of digital ethnography. The research process followed four key steps: search, selection, analysis and synthesis. In the search phase, we searched contributions iteratively in Web of Science and Scopus by using a variety of keywords corresponding to the different labels used to refer to digital ethnography. In the selection phase, we adopted a selective stance that aims to provide a critical review of the existing research and practices in the context of digital ethnography. In the analysis phase, we carried out a content analysis of the papers combining deductive and inductive coding. The synthesis phase involves a process of typology development to pragmatically reduce and systematize an extensive set of features and digital ethnography practices. Basing on the type of data collected (Small vs Big Data) and the type of fieldwork (meta or contextual field), we detected four types of ethnographic research: social media ethnography , contextual digital ethnography , meta digital ethnography , cross-media ethnography .","PeriodicalId":38025,"journal":{"name":"Italian Sociological Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13136/ISR.V11I4S.434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Digital ethnography can be defined as a contemporary form of ethnography which considers online social spaces of discussion following the advances in data transmission technology. In the last few years, various attempts of considering online spaces in ethnographic research have been made producing different styles of online ethnography, each identified by a different label. This paper aims to provide a systematic review of the topic to map the practice of digital ethnography. The research process followed four key steps: search, selection, analysis and synthesis. In the search phase, we searched contributions iteratively in Web of Science and Scopus by using a variety of keywords corresponding to the different labels used to refer to digital ethnography. In the selection phase, we adopted a selective stance that aims to provide a critical review of the existing research and practices in the context of digital ethnography. In the analysis phase, we carried out a content analysis of the papers combining deductive and inductive coding. The synthesis phase involves a process of typology development to pragmatically reduce and systematize an extensive set of features and digital ethnography practices. Basing on the type of data collected (Small vs Big Data) and the type of fieldwork (meta or contextual field), we detected four types of ethnographic research: social media ethnography , contextual digital ethnography , meta digital ethnography , cross-media ethnography .
数字民族志可以被定义为一种当代形式的民族志,它考虑了随着数据传输技术的进步而讨论的在线社会空间。在过去的几年里,在民族志研究中考虑在线空间的各种尝试已经产生了不同风格的在线民族志,每种风格都有不同的标签。本文旨在对该主题进行系统的回顾,以绘制数字民族志的实践。研究过程包括四个关键步骤:搜索、选择、分析和综合。在检索阶段,我们在Web of Science和Scopus中迭代检索贡献,使用与数字人种志不同标签对应的各种关键词。在选择阶段,我们采取了一种选择性的立场,旨在对数字人种学背景下的现有研究和实践进行批判性的回顾。在分析阶段,我们结合演绎编码和归纳编码对论文进行了内容分析。综合阶段包括类型学发展的过程,以务实地减少和系统化一套广泛的特征和数字人种学实践。根据收集的数据类型(小数据vs大数据)和田野调查类型(元或情境场),我们发现了四种类型的民族志研究:社交媒体民族志、情境数字民族志、元数字民族志、跨媒体民族志。
期刊介绍:
The Italian Sociological Review is as an academic journal for the dissemination of theoretical reflections and results of empirical research on social science, conducted with scientific methodologies and made available to a wider audience. The research results may have an impact on policy-makers, on the processes of formation of the students and the development and integration of theories and paradigms. It is therefore important that the journal maintains a high level of quality and transparency in the process of publication.