Making Teacher and Researcher Learning Visible: Collaborative Design as a Context for Professional Growth

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Monlin Ko, Allison B. Hall, S. Goldman
{"title":"Making Teacher and Researcher Learning Visible: Collaborative Design as a Context for Professional Growth","authors":"Monlin Ko, Allison B. Hall, S. Goldman","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2021.2010212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Collaborative design (co-design) involving practitioners and researchers is emerging as a productive context for addressing theoretical as well as practical issues of teaching and learning. Co-design affords learning opportunities for all participants, although the focus has typically been on teachers. In this study, the Interconnected Interactive Model of Professional Growth (IIMPG) serves as a conceptual tool for tracing professional growth pathways of teachers and researchers in co-design contexts. The IIMPG is illustrated through a case study of a teacher and a researcher during a multi-year co-design project. Interactional analyses of their co-design work indicated change in the roles of the teacher and the researcher, knowledge of science inquiry as text-based modeling, and strategies for supporting students in engaging in it. Four years later, the teacher and researcher collaborated in retrospective reflection on their co-design work. Analyses revealed increased awareness of the underlying principles governing the multiple components of the design and how these supported conceptual coherence and interconnected knowledge for students. The multiple lenses and timescales enabled new insights on when, how, and why people learn during collaborative design. The IIMPG served as a generative tool for capturing professional growth pathways for teachers and researchers over iterative co-design cycles.","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":"40 1","pages":"27 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010212","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Collaborative design (co-design) involving practitioners and researchers is emerging as a productive context for addressing theoretical as well as practical issues of teaching and learning. Co-design affords learning opportunities for all participants, although the focus has typically been on teachers. In this study, the Interconnected Interactive Model of Professional Growth (IIMPG) serves as a conceptual tool for tracing professional growth pathways of teachers and researchers in co-design contexts. The IIMPG is illustrated through a case study of a teacher and a researcher during a multi-year co-design project. Interactional analyses of their co-design work indicated change in the roles of the teacher and the researcher, knowledge of science inquiry as text-based modeling, and strategies for supporting students in engaging in it. Four years later, the teacher and researcher collaborated in retrospective reflection on their co-design work. Analyses revealed increased awareness of the underlying principles governing the multiple components of the design and how these supported conceptual coherence and interconnected knowledge for students. The multiple lenses and timescales enabled new insights on when, how, and why people learn during collaborative design. The IIMPG served as a generative tool for capturing professional growth pathways for teachers and researchers over iterative co-design cycles.
让教师和研究人员的学习可见:协同设计作为专业成长的背景
摘要由从业者和研究人员参与的协同设计(co-design)正在成为解决教学理论和实践问题的一种富有成效的环境。联合设计为所有参与者提供了学习机会,尽管重点通常放在教师身上。在本研究中,专业成长的互联互动模型(IIMPG)作为一个概念工具,用于追踪教师和研究人员在共同设计环境中的专业成长路径。IIMPG通过一名教师和一名研究人员在一个多年联合设计项目中的案例研究进行了说明。对他们共同设计工作的互动分析表明,教师和研究人员的角色发生了变化,科学探究作为基于文本的建模的知识以及支持学生参与其中的策略发生了变化。四年后,教师和研究员合作对他们的共同设计工作进行了回顾性反思。分析显示,人们对设计的多个组成部分的基本原则以及这些原则如何支持学生的概念连贯性和相互关联的知识有了更多的认识。多重视角和时间尺度使人们能够对合作设计中的学习时间、方式和原因有新的见解。IIMPG是一个生成工具,用于捕捉教师和研究人员在迭代联合设计周期中的专业成长路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信