Extradisciplinary risk-taking: Design education as institutional critique

IF 0.3 0 ART
Oliver Vodeb
{"title":"Extradisciplinary risk-taking: Design education as institutional critique","authors":"Oliver Vodeb","doi":"10.1386/ADCH.18.1.113_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk in education in the creative field of communication design is usually seen in connection with creativity as subjective expression and innovation as desired impact. This article positions risk in relation to the political in design education. It puts forward the argument that a particular type of risk-taking in education can work towards shifting design from a position of a service-providing activity towards a more emancipated practice, which would not comply with the pressures of neoliberal capitalism. To counter the current state of compliance this article suggests a three-level model of extradisciplinary risk-taking as institutional critique. The case of Memefest and Design Futures is discussed. Theoretical analysis is combined with (auto) ethnography and qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":42996,"journal":{"name":"Art Design & Communication in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Design & Communication in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ADCH.18.1.113_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Risk in education in the creative field of communication design is usually seen in connection with creativity as subjective expression and innovation as desired impact. This article positions risk in relation to the political in design education. It puts forward the argument that a particular type of risk-taking in education can work towards shifting design from a position of a service-providing activity towards a more emancipated practice, which would not comply with the pressures of neoliberal capitalism. To counter the current state of compliance this article suggests a three-level model of extradisciplinary risk-taking as institutional critique. The case of Memefest and Design Futures is discussed. Theoretical analysis is combined with (auto) ethnography and qualitative research.
学科外冒险:作为制度批判的设计教育
在传播设计创意领域的教育中,风险通常被视为创造性的主观表达,创新是预期的影响。本文将风险定位为设计教育中的政治风险。它提出了这样一种论点,即教育中的一种特殊类型的冒险行为可以将设计从服务提供活动的位置转变为更解放的实践,这将不符合新自由主义资本主义的压力。为了应对当前的合规状态,本文提出了一个三级的学科外冒险模型作为制度批判。讨论了Memefest和Design Futures的案例。理论分析与民族志和定性研究相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信