Trump's Trade Policy, BREXIT, Corona Dynamics, EU Crisis and Declining Multilateralism.

IF 1.5 Q2 ECONOMICS
Paul J J Welfens
{"title":"Trump's Trade Policy, BREXIT, Corona Dynamics, EU Crisis and Declining Multilateralism.","authors":"Paul J J Welfens","doi":"10.1007/s10368-020-00479-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1991 there has been a reinforcement of the World Market Economy, not least since China and the, then new Russian Federation have joined the World Trade Organization and because of EU Eastern enlargement and ASEAN integration deepening, while the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations seemed to indicate stronger regional integration dynamics. With the Trump Administration, the situation has changed dramatically as President Trump is supportive of neither multilateralism in general nor of the EU, which is weakened through BREXIT, in particular. Trump's focus on the US merchandise trade balance deficit is ill-placed and import tariffs imposed on China seem to be excessive as the optimum tariff rate is miscalculated on the basis of the traditional formula - while a new adequate formula would include the role of sectoral US outward FDI stocks. Asia, the EU and the US could define fighting the Corona World Recession as a global public good, but the United States is weakened in the corona pandemic crisis; the EU is facing serious problems in avoiding a Euro Crisis 2 problem and the €750 billion EU loan package could undermine the Eurozone's stability while being inadequate to minimize the risk of a Euro Crisis 2. At the same time, the prospects for EU cooperation are declining due to political disappointment concerning the national corona pandemic policy in some member countries. An effective anti-corona pandemic policy would mean to organize a consistent EU-ASEAN cooperation or a G20 cooperation with a later extension to UN Organizations, including the IMF, the World Bank and the WHO. Post-corona, global governance could change strongly because of the long-term political scarring effects of the pandemic shock which could undermine EU and Western stability. Networked international leadership in support of multilateralism is an innovative - but difficult - option for EU-ASEAN-Mercosur<b>.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":42639,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY","volume":"17 1","pages":"563-634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-020-00479-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1991 there has been a reinforcement of the World Market Economy, not least since China and the, then new Russian Federation have joined the World Trade Organization and because of EU Eastern enlargement and ASEAN integration deepening, while the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations seemed to indicate stronger regional integration dynamics. With the Trump Administration, the situation has changed dramatically as President Trump is supportive of neither multilateralism in general nor of the EU, which is weakened through BREXIT, in particular. Trump's focus on the US merchandise trade balance deficit is ill-placed and import tariffs imposed on China seem to be excessive as the optimum tariff rate is miscalculated on the basis of the traditional formula - while a new adequate formula would include the role of sectoral US outward FDI stocks. Asia, the EU and the US could define fighting the Corona World Recession as a global public good, but the United States is weakened in the corona pandemic crisis; the EU is facing serious problems in avoiding a Euro Crisis 2 problem and the €750 billion EU loan package could undermine the Eurozone's stability while being inadequate to minimize the risk of a Euro Crisis 2. At the same time, the prospects for EU cooperation are declining due to political disappointment concerning the national corona pandemic policy in some member countries. An effective anti-corona pandemic policy would mean to organize a consistent EU-ASEAN cooperation or a G20 cooperation with a later extension to UN Organizations, including the IMF, the World Bank and the WHO. Post-corona, global governance could change strongly because of the long-term political scarring effects of the pandemic shock which could undermine EU and Western stability. Networked international leadership in support of multilateralism is an innovative - but difficult - option for EU-ASEAN-Mercosur.

特朗普的贸易政策、英国脱欧、科罗纳动态、欧盟危机和多边主义衰落
自1991年以来,世界市场经济得到了加强,尤其是自从中国和当时新成立的俄罗斯联邦加入世界贸易组织以来,以及由于欧盟东扩和东盟一体化的深化,而跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴关系(TTIP)和跨太平洋伙伴关系(TPP)谈判似乎表明了更强的区域一体化动力。特朗普政府上台后,情况发生了巨大变化,特朗普总统既不支持多边主义,也不支持因英国脱欧而被削弱的欧盟。特朗普对美国商品贸易逆差的关注是不恰当的,对中国征收的进口关税似乎过高,因为根据传统公式错误地计算了最优关税税率——而一个新的适当公式将包括美国部门对外直接投资存量的作用。亚洲、欧盟和美国可以将抗击冠状病毒世界衰退定义为一项全球公益事业,但美国在冠状病毒大流行危机中被削弱了;欧盟在避免第二次欧元危机方面面临着严重的问题,欧盟7500亿欧元的贷款计划可能会破坏欧元区的稳定,同时也不足以将第二次欧元危机的风险降到最低。与此同时,由于一些成员国对国家冠状病毒大流行政策的政治失望,欧盟合作的前景正在下降。有效的抗冠状病毒大流行政策将意味着组织一致的欧盟-东盟合作或20国集团合作,并在以后扩展到联合国组织,包括国际货币基金组织、世界银行和世界卫生组织。冠状病毒后,全球治理可能会发生巨大变化,因为大流行冲击的长期政治疤痕效应可能会破坏欧盟和西方的稳定。对欧盟-东盟-南方共同市场来说,支持多边主义的网络化国际领导力是一个创新但困难的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The double-blind peer reviewed Journal International Economics and Economic Policy publishes empirical and theoretical contributions, especially papers which are relevant for economic policy. The main focus of the journal is on comparative economic policy, international political economy, including international organizations and policy cooperation, monetary and real/technological dynamics in open economies, globalization and regional integration, trade, migration, international investment, internet commerce and regulation.IEEP particularly offers contributions from the policy community and provides a forum for exchange for the academic and policy community. Officially cited as: Int Econ Econ Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信