Factors Associated with the Use of Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Colonoscopy in the INSEF Portuguese Population.

Q3 Medicine
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2021-06-18 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1159/000516502
Fábio Sousa Gomes, Irina Kislaya, Dulce Seabra, Eugénio Cordeiro, Baltazar Nunes
{"title":"Factors Associated with the Use of Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Colonoscopy in the INSEF Portuguese Population.","authors":"Fábio Sousa Gomes, Irina Kislaya, Dulce Seabra, Eugénio Cordeiro, Baltazar Nunes","doi":"10.1159/000516502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing worldwide. However, the screening uptake is generally low. We analyzed the association between sociodemographic, economic, and access-to-healthcare factors and the use of exams that are the basis for colorectal cancer screening in Portugal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study based on data from the 1st National Health Examination Survey. We used Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios and study factors associated with the use of fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and colonoscopy in a Portuguese population aged 50-74 years (<i>n</i> = 2,489).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45.7% of the individuals reported using FIT in the previous 2 years; 37.3% reported using colonoscopy in the previous 5 years. The use of FIT was associated with age group, health region, and having a family doctor. It was higher in older individuals (47.6% in the age group 70-74 years vs. 38.1% in the age group 50-54 years; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.32; 95% CI 1.05-1.65), and in individuals assigned to a family doctor (47.6 vs. 30.3%; aPR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.14-1.98). Colonoscopy was associated with age group, health region, higher education, economic capacity, and having a family doctor. It was higher in older individuals (45.3% in the age group 70-74 years vs. 25.6% in the age group 50-54 years; aPR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.42-2.40), individuals with a higher economic capacity (40.5 vs. 32.4%; aPR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.01-1.40), and individuals assigned to a family doctor (38.7 vs. 25.6%; aPR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.91).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>In our analysis, the use of FIT and colonoscopy was influenced by sociodemographic, economic, and access-to-healthcare factors. This is relevant to guide interventions in this area. It is essential to ensure an equitable and uniform implementation of the screening program, with family doctors as an important part of the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":37244,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","volume":"39 1","pages":"48-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing worldwide. However, the screening uptake is generally low. We analyzed the association between sociodemographic, economic, and access-to-healthcare factors and the use of exams that are the basis for colorectal cancer screening in Portugal.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study based on data from the 1st National Health Examination Survey. We used Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios and study factors associated with the use of fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and colonoscopy in a Portuguese population aged 50-74 years (n = 2,489).

Results: 45.7% of the individuals reported using FIT in the previous 2 years; 37.3% reported using colonoscopy in the previous 5 years. The use of FIT was associated with age group, health region, and having a family doctor. It was higher in older individuals (47.6% in the age group 70-74 years vs. 38.1% in the age group 50-54 years; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.32; 95% CI 1.05-1.65), and in individuals assigned to a family doctor (47.6 vs. 30.3%; aPR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.14-1.98). Colonoscopy was associated with age group, health region, higher education, economic capacity, and having a family doctor. It was higher in older individuals (45.3% in the age group 70-74 years vs. 25.6% in the age group 50-54 years; aPR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.42-2.40), individuals with a higher economic capacity (40.5 vs. 32.4%; aPR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.01-1.40), and individuals assigned to a family doctor (38.7 vs. 25.6%; aPR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.91).

Discussion/conclusion: In our analysis, the use of FIT and colonoscopy was influenced by sociodemographic, economic, and access-to-healthcare factors. This is relevant to guide interventions in this area. It is essential to ensure an equitable and uniform implementation of the screening program, with family doctors as an important part of the process.

在INSEF葡萄牙人群中使用粪便免疫化学试验和结肠镜检查的相关因素
简介:癌症的发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。然而,筛查的接受率通常较低。我们分析了社会人口统计学、经济和获得医疗保健的因素与葡萄牙结直肠癌癌症筛查基础检查的使用之间的关系。方法:我们根据第一次全国健康检查调查的数据进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用泊松回归来估计50-74岁葡萄牙人群(n=2489)中与使用粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)和结肠镜检查相关的患病率和研究因素。结果:45.7%的人报告在过去2年中使用FIT;37.3%的患者报告在过去5年中使用结肠镜检查。FIT的使用与年龄组、健康地区和是否有家庭医生有关。年龄较大的人(70–74岁年龄组为47.6%,50–54岁年龄组则为38.1%;调整后的患病率[aPR]=1.32;95%CI 1.05–1.65)和分配给家庭医生的人(47.6%,30.3%;aPR=1.50;95%CI 1.14–1.98)的患病率更高。结肠镜检查与年龄组、健康地区、高等教育、经济能力和是否有家庭医生有关。老年人(70–74岁年龄组45.3%,50–54岁年龄组25.6%;aPR=1.85;95%CI 1.42–2.40)、经济能力较高的人(40.5 vs.32.4%;aPR=1.19;95%CI 1.01–1.40)和家庭医生(38.7 vs.25.6%;a PR=1.43;95%CI 1.08–1.91)的发病率更高。讨论/结论:在我们的分析中,FIT和结肠镜检查的使用受到社会人口、经济和获得医疗保健因素的影响。这与指导这一领域的干预措施有关。确保筛查计划的公平和统一实施至关重要,家庭医生是这一过程的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
55 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信