An artificial intelligence perspective: How knowledge and confidence shape risk and benefit perception

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Nadia Said , Andreea E. Potinteu , Irina Brich , Jürgen Buder , Hanna Schumm , Markus Huff
{"title":"An artificial intelligence perspective: How knowledge and confidence shape risk and benefit perception","authors":"Nadia Said ,&nbsp;Andreea E. Potinteu ,&nbsp;Irina Brich ,&nbsp;Jürgen Buder ,&nbsp;Hanna Schumm ,&nbsp;Markus Huff","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2023.107855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly used in everyday life. Whereas some are widely accepted (e.g., automatically compiled playlists), others are highly controversial (e.g., using AI in the classroom). The public discourse reveals a somewhat ambiguous perception of AI, with enthusiasm about the tremendous positive potential of AI on the one hand and growing concerns about the existential dangers of uncontrolled artificial intelligence on the other hand. Thus, understanding the underlying mechanisms of what shapes people's perceptions of AI is vital to help explain AI usage and acceptance trends. In our research, we take a cognitive approach by measuring the perceived risks and benefits of AI applications considering people's knowledge and confidence in their knowledge. To this end, we assessed in two studies (</span><em>N</em> = 394 and <em>N</em><span> = 437; representative) how knowledge about AI and confidence in AI knowledge is related to participants' risk-benefit perception of AI scenarios from three domains: media, medicine, and autonomous driving. Results showed that both AI knowledge and confidence in AI knowledge are predictors regarding people's risk-benefit perception beyond people's attitudes towards AI. More specifically, people with more knowledge about AI exhibited so-called risk blindness; that is, they underestimated the risks. On the other hand, higher confidence in one's AI knowledge impacted participants' benefit assessment. Knowledge and confidence thus open a new dimension of understanding people's perception of risks and benefits in AI.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107855"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563223002066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly used in everyday life. Whereas some are widely accepted (e.g., automatically compiled playlists), others are highly controversial (e.g., using AI in the classroom). The public discourse reveals a somewhat ambiguous perception of AI, with enthusiasm about the tremendous positive potential of AI on the one hand and growing concerns about the existential dangers of uncontrolled artificial intelligence on the other hand. Thus, understanding the underlying mechanisms of what shapes people's perceptions of AI is vital to help explain AI usage and acceptance trends. In our research, we take a cognitive approach by measuring the perceived risks and benefits of AI applications considering people's knowledge and confidence in their knowledge. To this end, we assessed in two studies (N = 394 and N = 437; representative) how knowledge about AI and confidence in AI knowledge is related to participants' risk-benefit perception of AI scenarios from three domains: media, medicine, and autonomous driving. Results showed that both AI knowledge and confidence in AI knowledge are predictors regarding people's risk-benefit perception beyond people's attitudes towards AI. More specifically, people with more knowledge about AI exhibited so-called risk blindness; that is, they underestimated the risks. On the other hand, higher confidence in one's AI knowledge impacted participants' benefit assessment. Knowledge and confidence thus open a new dimension of understanding people's perception of risks and benefits in AI.

人工智能视角:知识和信心如何塑造风险和利益感知
人工智能(AI)应用越来越多地应用于日常生活中。有些被广泛接受(例如,自动编译的播放列表),而另一些则极具争议(例如,在课堂上使用人工智能)。公共话语揭示了人们对人工智能的模糊认知,一方面对人工智能巨大的积极潜力充满热情,另一方面对不受控制的人工智能的生存危险越来越担忧。因此,了解影响人们对人工智能感知的潜在机制对于帮助解释人工智能的使用和接受趋势至关重要。在我们的研究中,我们采取了一种认知方法,通过考虑人们的知识和对知识的信心来衡量人工智能应用的感知风险和收益。为此,我们在两项研究中评估了关于人工智能的知识和对人工智能知识的信心如何与参与者对媒体、医学和自动驾驶三个领域的人工智能场景的风险收益感知相关(N=394和N=437;具有代表性)。结果表明,人工智能知识和对人工智能知识的信心都是人们对人工智能的态度之外的风险收益感知的预测因素。更具体地说,对人工智能了解更多的人表现出所谓的风险盲症;也就是说,他们低估了风险。另一方面,对人工智能知识的更高信心影响了参与者的收益评估。因此,知识和信心为理解人们对人工智能风险和收益的感知开辟了一个新的维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信