Disentangling objective characteristics of learning situations from subjective perceptions thereof, using an experience sampling method design

J. Moeller, Jaana Viljaranta, B. Kracke, J. Dietrich
{"title":"Disentangling objective characteristics of learning situations from subjective perceptions thereof, using an experience sampling method design","authors":"J. Moeller, Jaana Viljaranta, B. Kracke, J. Dietrich","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/m4bs5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes a study design developed to disentangle the objective characteristics of a learning situation from individuals’ subjective perceptions of that situation. The term ‘objective characteristics’ refers to the agreements across students, like when students agree that the lecture of Educational Psychology by teacher Cook this morning was objectively much more interesting than the lesson about Introduction to Scientific Writing by teacher Smith yesterday evening, because teacher Cook used funny examples and gamified quizzes that most students liked, whereas teacher Smith did not. The term ‘subjective perceptions’ refers to the possibility of inter-individual heterogeneity, meaning student Max might report higher situational interest than students Emma, Ben, and Anna in the lecture of teacher Cook this morning, despite the fact that the students agreed (on average) that this lecture was more interesting than the lecture by teacher Smith yesterday evening.We describe a novel strategy for assessing and disentangling objective situation characteristics and subjective perceptions thereof, propose methods for analyzing the resulting data, and illustrate the procedure with an example of a first study using this design to examine situational interest in 155 university students. Situational interest was assessed nine times per weekly lecture with three measurement time points per person and a rotated multi-group schedule. Assessments took place over the course of an entire semester of ten weeks.One of the advantages of the proposed design is that ‘objective’ group agreements can be disentangled from subjective deviations from the group’s average at each of the nine measurement time points per weekly lecture. Furthermore, the proposed design makes it possible to study the development of both subjective and objective parameters across the time span of one weekly lecture and an entire semester, while the burden for each person is kept relatively low with three beeps per week.","PeriodicalId":37057,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Learning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/m4bs5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This article proposes a study design developed to disentangle the objective characteristics of a learning situation from individuals’ subjective perceptions of that situation. The term ‘objective characteristics’ refers to the agreements across students, like when students agree that the lecture of Educational Psychology by teacher Cook this morning was objectively much more interesting than the lesson about Introduction to Scientific Writing by teacher Smith yesterday evening, because teacher Cook used funny examples and gamified quizzes that most students liked, whereas teacher Smith did not. The term ‘subjective perceptions’ refers to the possibility of inter-individual heterogeneity, meaning student Max might report higher situational interest than students Emma, Ben, and Anna in the lecture of teacher Cook this morning, despite the fact that the students agreed (on average) that this lecture was more interesting than the lecture by teacher Smith yesterday evening.We describe a novel strategy for assessing and disentangling objective situation characteristics and subjective perceptions thereof, propose methods for analyzing the resulting data, and illustrate the procedure with an example of a first study using this design to examine situational interest in 155 university students. Situational interest was assessed nine times per weekly lecture with three measurement time points per person and a rotated multi-group schedule. Assessments took place over the course of an entire semester of ten weeks.One of the advantages of the proposed design is that ‘objective’ group agreements can be disentangled from subjective deviations from the group’s average at each of the nine measurement time points per weekly lecture. Furthermore, the proposed design makes it possible to study the development of both subjective and objective parameters across the time span of one weekly lecture and an entire semester, while the burden for each person is kept relatively low with three beeps per week.
使用经验抽样方法设计,从主观感知中分离学习情境的客观特征
本文提出了一种研究设计,旨在将学习情境的客观特征与个人对该情境的主观感知区分开来。“客观特征”一词指的是学生之间的一致性,比如学生们一致认为库克老师今天上午的教育心理学课客观上比史密斯老师昨天晚上的科学写作导论课有趣得多,因为库克老师使用了大多数学生喜欢的有趣的例子和游戏化的测验,而史密斯老师没有。“主观感知”一词指的是个体间异质性的可能性,这意味着学生Max在今天上午库克老师的讲座中可能比学生Emma、Ben和Anna报告的情境兴趣更高,尽管学生们(平均而言)一致认为这次讲座比史密斯老师昨天晚上的讲座更有趣。我们描述了一种评估和理清客观情境特征及其主观感知的新策略,提出了分析所得数据的方法,并以第一项使用该设计对155名大学生的情境兴趣进行调查的研究为例说明了这一过程。情境兴趣每周一次评估九次,每人三个测量时间点,多组轮流安排。评估在整整十周的学期中进行。所提出的设计的优点之一是,在每周讲座的九个测量时间点中的每一个时间点,“客观”的团体协议都可以与团体平均值的主观偏差相分离。此外,所提出的设计可以研究在一周讲座和整个学期的时间跨度内主观和客观参数的发展,同时每个人的负担相对较低,每周发出三声蜂鸣声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontline Learning Research
Frontline Learning Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信