Effects of seed treatments and yield potential on infected soybean seed

IF 1.7 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Alexandria Jade Haafke, Y. Kandel, J. Batzer, N. K. Dangal, D. Mueller
{"title":"Effects of seed treatments and yield potential on infected soybean seed","authors":"Alexandria Jade Haafke, Y. Kandel, J. Batzer, N. K. Dangal, D. Mueller","doi":"10.1094/php-03-23-0019-rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diaporthe seed decay (DSD) is an endemic disease throughout most soybean growing regions. A major outbreak of DSD occurred in 2018 in Iowa and other parts of the U.S. The most prevalent fungi associated with this outbreak in Iowa were Diaporthe longicolla and D. caulivora. We established field experiments in 2019 and 2020 in two central Iowa locations to evaluate the effects of seed treatments and yield potential of Diaporthe-infected seed lots. Seed of the same variety but originating from different sources were categorized as “good” or “bad” seed and depending on percent of Diaporthe-infected seed. Four seed treatments were tested, and results indicated that there were differences in plant stand, plant health (normalized difference vegetation index and canopy coverage) (both years), and yield (2019) between both seed lots. The good seed lot had about 9% greater yield than the bad seed lot (P < 0.001), while seed lots had similar yield in 2020 (P = 0.822). Seed treatments improved stand, canopy greenness, and canopy coverage, but did not affect yield in either year. For the yield potential experiment, there were minimal differences in plant health and no differences in yield between good and bad seed lots thinned to the same plant population in both years. These results suggest Diaporthe-infected seed lots with lower germination and plant stand resulted in less yield, and seed treatments can improve soybean stand, canopy greenness, and coverage. Also, Diaporthe-infected seed did not affect soybean growth and development or yield once plant stand was established.","PeriodicalId":20251,"journal":{"name":"Plant Health Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Health Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-03-23-0019-rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diaporthe seed decay (DSD) is an endemic disease throughout most soybean growing regions. A major outbreak of DSD occurred in 2018 in Iowa and other parts of the U.S. The most prevalent fungi associated with this outbreak in Iowa were Diaporthe longicolla and D. caulivora. We established field experiments in 2019 and 2020 in two central Iowa locations to evaluate the effects of seed treatments and yield potential of Diaporthe-infected seed lots. Seed of the same variety but originating from different sources were categorized as “good” or “bad” seed and depending on percent of Diaporthe-infected seed. Four seed treatments were tested, and results indicated that there were differences in plant stand, plant health (normalized difference vegetation index and canopy coverage) (both years), and yield (2019) between both seed lots. The good seed lot had about 9% greater yield than the bad seed lot (P < 0.001), while seed lots had similar yield in 2020 (P = 0.822). Seed treatments improved stand, canopy greenness, and canopy coverage, but did not affect yield in either year. For the yield potential experiment, there were minimal differences in plant health and no differences in yield between good and bad seed lots thinned to the same plant population in both years. These results suggest Diaporthe-infected seed lots with lower germination and plant stand resulted in less yield, and seed treatments can improve soybean stand, canopy greenness, and coverage. Also, Diaporthe-infected seed did not affect soybean growth and development or yield once plant stand was established.
种子处理和产量潜力对侵染大豆种子的影响
大豆种子腐烂病(DSD)是大多数大豆种植区的地方病。2018年,爱荷华州和美国其他地区爆发了一次大规模DSD疫情。与此次疫情相关的爱荷华州最流行的真菌是长孔双孢菌和科氏双孢菌。我们于2019年和2020年在爱荷华州中部的两个地点进行了田间试验,以评估种子处理的效果和受Diaporthe感染的种子批次的产量潜力。同一品种但来源不同的种子被归类为“好”或“坏”种子,这取决于受感染种子的Diaport百分比。测试了四种种子处理,结果表明,两个种子批次在林分、植物健康(归一化差异植被指数和冠层覆盖率)(两个年份)和产量(2019年)方面存在差异。好种子批次的产量比坏种子批次高出约9%(P<0.001),而种子批次在2020年的产量相似(P=0.822)。种子处理改善了林分、冠层绿色和冠层覆盖率,但对任何一年的产量都没有影响。对于产量潜力实验,在同一植物群体中,两年内,好种子和坏种子批次之间的植物健康差异最小,产量没有差异。这些结果表明,受Diaporthe感染的发芽率和林分较低的种子批导致产量较低,种子处理可以改善大豆的林分、冠层绿度和覆盖率。此外,一旦建立林分,受感染的大豆种子不会影响大豆的生长发育或产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Health Progress
Plant Health Progress Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Plant Health Progress, a member journal of the Plant Management Network, is a multidisciplinary science-based journal covering all aspects of applied plant health management in agriculture and horticulture. Both peer-reviewed and fully citable, the journal is a credible online-only publication. Plant Health Progress is a not-for-profit collaborative endeavor of the plant health community at large, serving practitioners worldwide. Its primary goal is to provide a comprehensive one-stop Internet resource for plant health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信