Efficacy of implantoplasty in management of peri-implantitis: A systematic review.

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dolanchanpa Dasgupta, Saurav Banerjee, Nikita Parasrampuria, Dipankar Pal
{"title":"Efficacy of implantoplasty in management of peri-implantitis: A systematic review.","authors":"Dolanchanpa Dasgupta, Saurav Banerjee, Nikita Parasrampuria, Dipankar Pal","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_102_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Peri-implantitis causes progressive loss of the supporting bony structure around the dental implant. Implantoplasty mechanically removes contaminated threads to achieve smoother implant surface thus reducing the bacterial load enabling fibroblastic growth to stimulate the healing effect. This Systematic review is done to appraise the outcome of implantoplasty on surface quality of Implant (roughness), biocompatibility of implants in peri-implantitis cases.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The Settings of the studies are major online databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane online library. The design of the current study is systematic review of published qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>37 articles were identified for the present review and systematic electronic literature search was done from August 2022 to January 2023, via PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and The Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases [PRISMA guidelines]. In vitro studies on implantoplasty for peri-implantitis were included for the review. 2 examiners independently selected based on the inclusion criteria and recorded the necessary data.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Risk of bias assessment tool was evaluated with Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and screened based on Selection, Comparability, and Outcome with the following categories: - maximum of 4, 2 and 4 points respectively. The observations were tabulated and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 8 selected studies, two studies reported no statistical difference between implantoplasty and control, one study proposed carbide burs were better than diamond burs, another study also suggested multilaminar burs were better than diamond and carbide. The Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) score for the quality of the included studies ranged from 6 to 8. Two of the studies had score of 6 points, eight had 7 points and one had 8 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implantoplasty has been recommended as an efficacious treatment protocol for peri-implantitis that helps to diminish the inflammation and accompanied by a high success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"23 1","pages":"210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_102_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Peri-implantitis causes progressive loss of the supporting bony structure around the dental implant. Implantoplasty mechanically removes contaminated threads to achieve smoother implant surface thus reducing the bacterial load enabling fibroblastic growth to stimulate the healing effect. This Systematic review is done to appraise the outcome of implantoplasty on surface quality of Implant (roughness), biocompatibility of implants in peri-implantitis cases.

Settings and design: The Settings of the studies are major online databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane online library. The design of the current study is systematic review of published qualitative studies.

Materials and method: 37 articles were identified for the present review and systematic electronic literature search was done from August 2022 to January 2023, via PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and The Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases [PRISMA guidelines]. In vitro studies on implantoplasty for peri-implantitis were included for the review. 2 examiners independently selected based on the inclusion criteria and recorded the necessary data.

Statistical analysis used: Risk of bias assessment tool was evaluated with Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and screened based on Selection, Comparability, and Outcome with the following categories: - maximum of 4, 2 and 4 points respectively. The observations were tabulated and analysed.

Results: Among the 8 selected studies, two studies reported no statistical difference between implantoplasty and control, one study proposed carbide burs were better than diamond burs, another study also suggested multilaminar burs were better than diamond and carbide. The Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) score for the quality of the included studies ranged from 6 to 8. Two of the studies had score of 6 points, eight had 7 points and one had 8 points.

Conclusion: Implantoplasty has been recommended as an efficacious treatment protocol for peri-implantitis that helps to diminish the inflammation and accompanied by a high success rate.

种植体成形术治疗种植体周围炎的疗效:系统综述
目的:种植体周围炎引起种植体周围支撑骨结构的进行性损失。种植体成形术通过机械去除受污染的线,使种植体表面更光滑,从而减少细菌负荷,促进成纤维细胞生长,促进愈合效果。本文对种植体周围炎患者的种植体表面质量(粗糙度)、种植体生物相容性进行系统评价。设置和设计:研究的设置是主要的在线数据库,如PubMed, Scopus和Cochrane在线图书馆。本研究的设计是对已发表的定性研究进行系统回顾。材料和方法:从2022年8月到2023年1月,通过PubMed、Scopus、Medline和Cochrane Library (Wiley)数据库[PRISMA指南],对37篇文章进行了系统的电子文献检索。本文综述了种植体成形术治疗种植体周围炎的体外研究。2名审查员根据纳入标准独立选择,并记录必要的数据。使用的统计分析:偏倚风险评估工具采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估,并根据选择、可比性和结果进行筛选,分类如下:-最大分别为4,2和4分。观察结果被制成表格并加以分析。结果:入选的8项研究中,2项研究报告种植成形术与对照组无统计学差异,1项研究提出硬质合金毛刺优于金刚石毛刺,另一项研究也提出多层毛刺优于金刚石和硬质合金。纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)对纳入研究的质量评分范围为6至8分。其中2项研究得分为6分,8项为7分,1项为8分。结论:种植体成形术是一种有效的治疗种植体周围炎的方法,可减轻炎症,成功率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信