Assessing students' factual, conceptual, and procedural knowledge of Newton's Laws of motion

Zerihun Anibo Cashata, Desta Gebyehu Seyoum, Shemelise Assefa Alemu
{"title":"Assessing students' factual, conceptual, and procedural knowledge of Newton's Laws of motion","authors":"Zerihun Anibo Cashata, Desta Gebyehu Seyoum, Shemelise Assefa Alemu","doi":"10.21067/mpej.v6i2.6664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to assess the difficulties in factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, and procedural knowledge of physics pre-service teachers on Newton’s laws of motion. The study was conducted in four colleges of teacher education located in the southern regions of Ethiopia .This study employed descriptive survey methods. For data collection, 14- Factual-Knowledge Test, 19- Conceptual understanding test and 3-open ended questionaries’ were used. Descriptive statics such as means, standard deviations, percentages, frequencies, and Minnesota Assessment of problem solving Rubric are used for written solution, where 136 students were involved in the quantitative part. They were consulted in the qualitative part of this study. The findings reveal a lack of conceptual understanding (61 percent) and procedural knowledge among pre-service physics teachers. This is evident in their low performance in the category or indicator dimensions of using, determining, and understanding problems (56 percent), in writing laws and principles (61%), and in determining the correct answer to problems (59 percent). A reasonable recommendation is given to solve the problem so that the pre-service physics teacher has adequate conceptual and procedural knowledge.","PeriodicalId":32065,"journal":{"name":"Momentum Physics Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Momentum Physics Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i2.6664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aims to assess the difficulties in factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, and procedural knowledge of physics pre-service teachers on Newton’s laws of motion. The study was conducted in four colleges of teacher education located in the southern regions of Ethiopia .This study employed descriptive survey methods. For data collection, 14- Factual-Knowledge Test, 19- Conceptual understanding test and 3-open ended questionaries’ were used. Descriptive statics such as means, standard deviations, percentages, frequencies, and Minnesota Assessment of problem solving Rubric are used for written solution, where 136 students were involved in the quantitative part. They were consulted in the qualitative part of this study. The findings reveal a lack of conceptual understanding (61 percent) and procedural knowledge among pre-service physics teachers. This is evident in their low performance in the category or indicator dimensions of using, determining, and understanding problems (56 percent), in writing laws and principles (61%), and in determining the correct answer to problems (59 percent). A reasonable recommendation is given to solve the problem so that the pre-service physics teacher has adequate conceptual and procedural knowledge.
评估学生对牛顿运动定律的事实性、概念性和程序性知识
本研究旨在评估物理职前教师在牛顿的事实知识、概念理解和程序知识方面的困难™运动定律。这项研究在埃塞俄比亚南部地区的四所师范学院进行。本研究采用描述性调查方法。对于数据收集,14-事实知识测试,19-概念理解测试和3个开放式问卷™ 使用。描述性静力学,如平均值、标准差、百分比、频率和明尼苏达州问题解决评估准则,用于书面解决方案,其中136名学生参与了定量部分。在本研究的定性部分咨询了他们。研究结果显示,职前物理教师缺乏概念理解(61%)和程序知识。这表现在他们在使用、确定和理解问题的类别或指标维度(56%)、书写法律和原则(61%)以及确定问题的正确答案(59%)方面表现不佳。提出了合理的解决建议,使职前物理教师具备足够的概念和程序知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信