An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Budget Deficits (Total and Primary) and Personal Income Tax Rates on the Ex Post Real Interest Rate Yield on Long-Term U.S. Treasury Bonds

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
R. Cebula
{"title":"An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Budget Deficits (Total and Primary) and Personal Income Tax Rates on the Ex Post Real Interest Rate Yield on Long-Term U.S. Treasury Bonds","authors":"R. Cebula","doi":"10.15353/rea.v11i2.1625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This empirical study adopts an open-economy loanable funds model to investigate the impact of post-Bretton Woods U.S. federal government budget deficits and personal income tax rates on the ex post real interest rate yield on thirty-year Treasury bonds. In this study, the budget deficit is measured in two different ways, the total (“unified”) budget deficit and the primary deficit (the total/unified deficit minus net interest payments). Two different estimation techniques, autoregressive two stage least squares estimation and the ARCH (Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity) Method, for the 1973-2016 study period provide evidence that the ex post real interest rate yield on thirty-year Treasury bonds has been an increasing function of both federal budget deficit measures (expressed as a percent of GDP) and the maximum marginal federal personal income tax rate. The estimations all imply that elevating either the total/unified or primary federal budget deficit appears to raise the cost of borrowing in the U.S., whereas reducing the maximum marginal personal income tax rate appears to reduce the cost of borrowing. Given the potential effects of longer-term real interest rates on investment in new plant and equipment and overall economic growth, policy-makers should not overlook these findings.","PeriodicalId":42350,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15353/rea.v11i2.1625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This empirical study adopts an open-economy loanable funds model to investigate the impact of post-Bretton Woods U.S. federal government budget deficits and personal income tax rates on the ex post real interest rate yield on thirty-year Treasury bonds. In this study, the budget deficit is measured in two different ways, the total (“unified”) budget deficit and the primary deficit (the total/unified deficit minus net interest payments). Two different estimation techniques, autoregressive two stage least squares estimation and the ARCH (Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity) Method, for the 1973-2016 study period provide evidence that the ex post real interest rate yield on thirty-year Treasury bonds has been an increasing function of both federal budget deficit measures (expressed as a percent of GDP) and the maximum marginal federal personal income tax rate. The estimations all imply that elevating either the total/unified or primary federal budget deficit appears to raise the cost of borrowing in the U.S., whereas reducing the maximum marginal personal income tax rate appears to reduce the cost of borrowing. Given the potential effects of longer-term real interest rates on investment in new plant and equipment and overall economic growth, policy-makers should not overlook these findings.
预算赤字(总赤字和基本赤字)和个人所得税税率对美国长期国债事后实际利率收益率影响的实证分析
本实证研究采用开放经济可贷资金模型,考察后布雷顿森林体系时代美国联邦政府预算赤字和个人所得税税率对30年期美国国债税前实际利率收益率的影响。在本研究中,预算赤字以两种不同的方式衡量,即总(“统一”)预算赤字和基本赤字(总/统一赤字减去净利息支付)。两种不同的估计技术,自回归两阶段最小二乘估计和ARCH(自回归条件异方差)方法,在1973-2016年的研究期间提供了证据,证明30年期国债的事后实际利率收益率是联邦预算赤字措施(以GDP的百分比表示)和联邦个人所得税最大边际税率的递增函数。这些估计都表明,提高总/统一或基本联邦预算赤字似乎会提高美国的借贷成本,而降低最高边际个人所得税率似乎会降低借贷成本。考虑到长期实际利率对新工厂和设备投资以及整体经济增长的潜在影响,政策制定者不应忽视这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信