Investigation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) residues and retention rates in two different face masks used during the COVID-19 lockdown period

Mehmet Ferhat Sari, Fatma Esen, Yücel Tasdemir
{"title":"Investigation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) residues and retention rates in two different face masks used during the COVID-19 lockdown period","authors":"Mehmet Ferhat Sari,&nbsp;Fatma Esen,&nbsp;Yücel Tasdemir","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2022.100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to determine the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations in the ambient air and in face masks of different configurations and to reveal how much masks protect from cancer risk. The total concentrations of 43 PCB congeners (∑<sub>43</sub>PCBs) in the particulate phase, measured with a high-volume air sampler (HVAS), were 169.2±30.7 pg/m<sup>3</sup> and the ∑<sub>43</sub>PCBs concentrations in surgical masks were found to be 201.6±66.6 pg/m<sup>3</sup>. Similarly, the ∑<sub>43</sub>PCBs concentrations in double surgical masks were 297.7±62.3 pg/m<sup>3</sup> and 126.7±31.7 pg/m<sup>3</sup> in non-surgical masks (cloth masks). A typical surgical mask consists of three layers (outer, filter and inner). The ∑<sub>43</sub>PCBs concentrations in the outer, filter and inner layers were 273.5±8.8, 199.1±25.7 and 132.1±25.9 pg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Finally, it has been determined how much the masks reduce the risk of cancer that may occur through inhalation of PCBs. According to the results, the mask with the lowest protection was the cloth mask, while the mask with the highest protection was the double surgical mask.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000162/pdfft?md5=ad59035d135da2302fb508f764c061b8&pid=1-s2.0-S2773049222000162-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations in the ambient air and in face masks of different configurations and to reveal how much masks protect from cancer risk. The total concentrations of 43 PCB congeners (∑43PCBs) in the particulate phase, measured with a high-volume air sampler (HVAS), were 169.2±30.7 pg/m3 and the ∑43PCBs concentrations in surgical masks were found to be 201.6±66.6 pg/m3. Similarly, the ∑43PCBs concentrations in double surgical masks were 297.7±62.3 pg/m3 and 126.7±31.7 pg/m3 in non-surgical masks (cloth masks). A typical surgical mask consists of three layers (outer, filter and inner). The ∑43PCBs concentrations in the outer, filter and inner layers were 273.5±8.8, 199.1±25.7 and 132.1±25.9 pg/m3, respectively. Finally, it has been determined how much the masks reduce the risk of cancer that may occur through inhalation of PCBs. According to the results, the mask with the lowest protection was the cloth mask, while the mask with the highest protection was the double surgical mask.

新型冠状病毒肺炎封锁期间两种口罩中多氯联苯残留及滞留率调查
本研究旨在确定环境空气和不同配置的口罩中多氯联苯(PCB)的浓度,并揭示口罩对癌症风险的保护程度。高容量空气采样器(HVAS)测得颗粒相中43种PCB同系物(∑43pcb)的总浓度为169.2±30.7 pg/m3,医用口罩中的∑43pcb浓度为201.6±66.6 pg/m3。双医用口罩(布口罩)的∑43PCBs浓度为297.7±62.3 pg/m3,非手术口罩(布口罩)的∑43PCBs浓度为126.7±31.7 pg/m3。典型的医用口罩由三层组成(外层、滤镜和内层)。外层、滤层和内层的∑43PCBs浓度分别为273.5±8.8、199.1±25.7和132.1±25.9 pg/m3。最后,人们还确定了口罩能在多大程度上降低因吸入多氯联苯而患癌症的风险。结果显示,防护效果最低的口罩为布质口罩,防护效果最高的口罩为双层医用口罩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信