How are different clusters of physical activity, sedentary, sleep, smoking, alcohol, and dietary behaviors associated with cardiometabolic health in older adults? A cross-sectional latent class analysis.

Simone J J M Verswijveren, Sara Dingle, Alan E Donnelly, Kieran P Dowd, Nicola D Ridgers, Brian P Carson, Patricia M Kearney, Janas M Harrington, Stephanie E Chappel, Cormac Powell
{"title":"How are different clusters of physical activity, sedentary, sleep, smoking, alcohol, and dietary behaviors associated with cardiometabolic health in older adults? A cross-sectional latent class analysis.","authors":"Simone J J M Verswijveren, Sara Dingle, Alan E Donnelly, Kieran P Dowd, Nicola D Ridgers, Brian P Carson, Patricia M Kearney, Janas M Harrington, Stephanie E Chappel, Cormac Powell","doi":"10.1186/s44167-023-00025-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies to date that investigate combined impacts of health behaviors, have rarely examined device-based movement behaviors alongside other health behaviors, such as smoking, alcohol, and sleep, on cardiometabolic health markers. The aim of this study was to identify distinct classes based on device-assessed movement behaviors (prolonged sitting, standing, stepping, and sleeping) and self-reported health behaviors (diet quality, alcohol consumption, and smoking status), and assess associations with cardiometabolic health markers in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from the Mitchelstown Cohort Rescreen (MCR) Study (2015-2017). In total, 1,378 older adults (aged 55-74 years) participated in the study, of whom 355 with valid activPAL3 Micro data were included in the analytical sample. Seven health behaviors (prolonged sitting, standing, stepping, sleep, diet quality, alcohol consumption, and smoking status) were included in a latent class analysis to identify groups of participants based on their distinct health behaviors. One-class through to six-class solutions were obtained and the best fit solution (i.e., optimal number of classes) was identified using a combination of best fit statistics (e.g., log likelihood, Akaike's information criteria) and interpretability of classes. Linear regression models were used to test associations of the derived classes with cardiometabolic health markers, including body mass index, body fat, fat mass, fat-free mass, glycated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 355 participants (89% of participants who were given the activPAL3 Micro) were included in the latent class analysis. Mean participant ages was 64.7 years and 45% were female. Two distinct classes were identified: \"Healthy time-users\" and \"Unhealthy time-users\". These groups differed in their movement behaviors, including physical activity, prolonged sitting, and sleep. However, smoking, nutrition, and alcohol intake habits among both groups were similar. Overall, no clear associations were observed between the derived classes and cardiometabolic risk markers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite having similar cardiometabolic health, two distinct clusters were identified, with differences in key behaviors such as prolonged sitting, stepping, and sleeping. This is suggestive of a complex interplay between many lifestyle behaviors, whereby one specific behavior alone cannot determine an individual's health status. Improving the identification of the relation of multiple risk factors with health is imperative, so that effective and targeted interventions for improving health in older adults can be designed and implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":73581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors","volume":" ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44167-023-00025-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies to date that investigate combined impacts of health behaviors, have rarely examined device-based movement behaviors alongside other health behaviors, such as smoking, alcohol, and sleep, on cardiometabolic health markers. The aim of this study was to identify distinct classes based on device-assessed movement behaviors (prolonged sitting, standing, stepping, and sleeping) and self-reported health behaviors (diet quality, alcohol consumption, and smoking status), and assess associations with cardiometabolic health markers in older adults.

Methods: The present study is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from the Mitchelstown Cohort Rescreen (MCR) Study (2015-2017). In total, 1,378 older adults (aged 55-74 years) participated in the study, of whom 355 with valid activPAL3 Micro data were included in the analytical sample. Seven health behaviors (prolonged sitting, standing, stepping, sleep, diet quality, alcohol consumption, and smoking status) were included in a latent class analysis to identify groups of participants based on their distinct health behaviors. One-class through to six-class solutions were obtained and the best fit solution (i.e., optimal number of classes) was identified using a combination of best fit statistics (e.g., log likelihood, Akaike's information criteria) and interpretability of classes. Linear regression models were used to test associations of the derived classes with cardiometabolic health markers, including body mass index, body fat, fat mass, fat-free mass, glycated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Results: In total, 355 participants (89% of participants who were given the activPAL3 Micro) were included in the latent class analysis. Mean participant ages was 64.7 years and 45% were female. Two distinct classes were identified: "Healthy time-users" and "Unhealthy time-users". These groups differed in their movement behaviors, including physical activity, prolonged sitting, and sleep. However, smoking, nutrition, and alcohol intake habits among both groups were similar. Overall, no clear associations were observed between the derived classes and cardiometabolic risk markers.

Discussion: Despite having similar cardiometabolic health, two distinct clusters were identified, with differences in key behaviors such as prolonged sitting, stepping, and sleeping. This is suggestive of a complex interplay between many lifestyle behaviors, whereby one specific behavior alone cannot determine an individual's health status. Improving the identification of the relation of multiple risk factors with health is imperative, so that effective and targeted interventions for improving health in older adults can be designed and implemented.

Abstract Image

不同类型的体力活动、久坐、睡眠、吸烟、饮酒和饮食行为与老年人心脏代谢健康有何关联?横断面潜在类分析
背景:迄今为止,研究健康行为的综合影响的研究很少将基于设备的运动行为与其他健康行为(如吸烟、饮酒和睡眠)一起对心脏代谢健康指标进行研究。本研究的目的是根据设备评估的运动行为(长时间坐着、站着、走路和睡觉)和自我报告的健康行为(饮食质量、饮酒和吸烟状况)来确定不同的类别,并评估老年人心脏代谢健康指标的相关性。方法:本研究是对Mitchelstown队列筛查(MCR)研究(2015-2017)数据的横断面二次分析。共有1378名老年人(55-74岁)参与了这项研究,其中355名具有有效activPAL3 Micro数据的老年人被纳入分析样本。7种健康行为(长时间坐着、站立、走路、睡眠、饮食质量、饮酒和吸烟状况)被纳入潜在类分析,以根据不同的健康行为确定参与者群体。获得了从一类到六类的解,并利用最佳拟合统计(如对数似然、赤池信息准则)和类的可解释性相结合,确定了最佳拟合解(即最优类数)。使用线性回归模型来检验衍生类与心脏代谢健康标志物的相关性,包括体重指数、体脂、脂肪量、无脂量、糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、极低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、收缩压和舒张压。结果:总共有355名参与者(给予activPAL3 Micro的参与者的89%)被纳入潜在类别分析。参与者平均年龄为64.7岁,其中45%为女性。确定了两个不同的类别:“健康的时间使用者”和“不健康的时间使用者”。这些群体的运动行为不同,包括体力活动、长时间坐着和睡眠。然而,两组的吸烟、营养和饮酒习惯是相似的。总体而言,未观察到衍生类别与心脏代谢风险标志物之间的明确关联。讨论:尽管心脏代谢健康状况相似,但我们发现了两种截然不同的人群,他们在长时间坐着、走路和睡觉等关键行为上存在差异。这暗示了许多生活方式行为之间复杂的相互作用,因此一种特定的行为不能单独决定个人的健康状况。必须进一步查明多种危险因素与健康之间的关系,以便设计和实施有效和有针对性的干预措施,改善老年人的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信