Ability of clock drawing errors on Mini-Cog test to predict development of delirium after major urological cancer surgery.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-30 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000177
Shugo Yajima, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Shunya Matsumoto, Naoya Okubo, Kenji Tanabe, Madoka Kataoka, Hitoshi Masuda
{"title":"Ability of clock drawing errors on Mini-Cog test to predict development of delirium after major urological cancer surgery.","authors":"Shugo Yajima, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Shunya Matsumoto, Naoya Okubo, Kenji Tanabe, Madoka Kataoka, Hitoshi Masuda","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the clock drawing test (CDT) on postoperative delirium and compare the abilities of the mini-cognitive (Mini-Cog) test and the CDT for predicting postoperative delirium after major urological cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective observational study, we collected the medical records of patients who underwent major urologic cancer surgery and preoperative cognitive screening based on the Mini-Cog test consisting of the CDT and the 3-word recall task at our department in 2020-2021 (n = 387). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the clinical risk factors for postoperative delirium. We also compared the ability of the CDT alone and the Mini-Cog test consisting of the CDT and 3-word recall task to predict postoperative delirium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients (30%) had abnormal CDT results. Postoperative delirium occurred in 29 patients (7%). On multivariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3 (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; <i>p</i> = 0.01), abnormal CDT (OR, 4.8; <i>p</i> < 0.001), preoperative benzodiazepine use (OR, 4.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and operative time ≥237 minutes (OR, 3.0; <i>p</i> = 0.01) were independent risk factors for postoperative delirium. The area under the curve for predicting postoperative delirium was 0.709 for CDT alone and 0.743 for the Mini-Cog test. No significant intergroup difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDT served as a formal but simple tool with adequate predictive power to identify the risk of postoperative delirium among patients undergoing major urological cancer surgery. Effective screening using the CDT might help provide optimal urological care for older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":" ","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the clock drawing test (CDT) on postoperative delirium and compare the abilities of the mini-cognitive (Mini-Cog) test and the CDT for predicting postoperative delirium after major urological cancer surgery.

Materials and methods: In this single-center retrospective observational study, we collected the medical records of patients who underwent major urologic cancer surgery and preoperative cognitive screening based on the Mini-Cog test consisting of the CDT and the 3-word recall task at our department in 2020-2021 (n = 387). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the clinical risk factors for postoperative delirium. We also compared the ability of the CDT alone and the Mini-Cog test consisting of the CDT and 3-word recall task to predict postoperative delirium.

Results: A total of 117 patients (30%) had abnormal CDT results. Postoperative delirium occurred in 29 patients (7%). On multivariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3 (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; p = 0.01), abnormal CDT (OR, 4.8; p < 0.001), preoperative benzodiazepine use (OR, 4.9; p < 0.001), and operative time ≥237 minutes (OR, 3.0; p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for postoperative delirium. The area under the curve for predicting postoperative delirium was 0.709 for CDT alone and 0.743 for the Mini-Cog test. No significant intergroup difference was observed (p = 0.43).

Conclusions: The CDT served as a formal but simple tool with adequate predictive power to identify the risk of postoperative delirium among patients undergoing major urological cancer surgery. Effective screening using the CDT might help provide optimal urological care for older patients.

Mini-Cog试验时钟绘制误差预测重大泌尿外科肿瘤术后谵妄发展的能力
背景:本研究旨在评价时钟描画试验(clock drawing test, CDT)对术后谵妄的影响,并比较mini-认知试验(Mini-Cog)和CDT对重大泌尿外科肿瘤手术后谵妄的预测能力。材料与方法:本研究为单中心回顾性观察性研究,收集我科2020-2021年行泌尿系统肿瘤大外科手术及术前认知筛查的Mini-Cog患者病历(n = 387),基于CDT和3字回忆任务组成的认知筛查。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定术后谵妄的临床危险因素。我们还比较了单独CDT和由CDT和3字回忆任务组成的Mini-Cog测试预测术后谵妄的能力。结果:117例(30%)患者CDT结果异常。术后出现谵妄29例(7%)。多因素分析显示,美国麻醉医师协会生理状态≥3(优势比[OR], 5.0;p = 0.01), CDT异常(OR, 4.8;p < 0.001),术前苯二氮卓类药物使用(OR, 4.9;p < 0.001),手术时间≥237分钟(OR, 3.0;P = 0.01)是术后谵妄的独立危险因素。预测术后谵妄的曲线下面积单独CDT为0.709,Mini-Cog试验为0.743。组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.43)。结论:CDT是一种正式但简单的工具,具有足够的预测能力,可以识别接受重大泌尿外科癌症手术的患者术后谵妄的风险。使用CDT进行有效的筛查可能有助于为老年患者提供最佳的泌尿科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信