Team approach to osteoarthritis management: Viewpoints of biokineticists and physiotherapists in South Africa.

Q3 Health Professions
South African Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2023-05-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17159/2078-516X/2023/v35i1a15260
R Gilchrist, A Kholvadia
{"title":"Team approach to osteoarthritis management: Viewpoints of biokineticists and physiotherapists in South Africa.","authors":"R Gilchrist, A Kholvadia","doi":"10.17159/2078-516X/2023/v35i1a15260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rehabilitative nature of biokinetics and physiotherapy in osteoarthritis management highlights a complex interaction between different professions to achieve effective outcomes for the patient. The success of a team approach is dependent on key competencies for optimal patient-focused care and appropriate cross-referral systems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore and describe the viewpoints of biokineticists and physiotherapists regarding a team approach to osteoarthritis management in the South African public and private healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive methodology with a convenience sampling technique was used. The target population consisted of biokineticists (n=47) and physiotherapists (n=165) located within the South African healthcare sectors. A self-administered, online questionnaire surveyed rehabilitative professionals' views of a team approach to osteoarthritis management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is no evidence that the biokineticists and physiotherapists differ with respect to how they rate the communication between team members in osteoarthritis management (p=0.68). Communication was viewed as neither of a high nor low quality by biokineticists (43%) and physiotherapists (36%). Biokineticists (54%) and physiotherapists (69%) felt adequately equipped on their understanding of the role of various healthcare professions involved in osteoarthritis management (p=0.22). However, 43% of rehabilitative professionals indicated that they had not been exposed to interprofessional education initiatives (p=0.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both professions were well-versed on the roles of various professions involved in osteoarthritis management, however, communication was not optimal. While this study creates an awareness of the benefits of team-based management for osteoarthritis, the findings could stimulate debate on the optimal implementation of key competencies required for effective teamwork, thereby facilitating patient-focused care and referral systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":31065,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"v35i1a15260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2023/v35i1a15260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rehabilitative nature of biokinetics and physiotherapy in osteoarthritis management highlights a complex interaction between different professions to achieve effective outcomes for the patient. The success of a team approach is dependent on key competencies for optimal patient-focused care and appropriate cross-referral systems.

Objectives: To explore and describe the viewpoints of biokineticists and physiotherapists regarding a team approach to osteoarthritis management in the South African public and private healthcare setting.

Methods: A descriptive methodology with a convenience sampling technique was used. The target population consisted of biokineticists (n=47) and physiotherapists (n=165) located within the South African healthcare sectors. A self-administered, online questionnaire surveyed rehabilitative professionals' views of a team approach to osteoarthritis management.

Results: There is no evidence that the biokineticists and physiotherapists differ with respect to how they rate the communication between team members in osteoarthritis management (p=0.68). Communication was viewed as neither of a high nor low quality by biokineticists (43%) and physiotherapists (36%). Biokineticists (54%) and physiotherapists (69%) felt adequately equipped on their understanding of the role of various healthcare professions involved in osteoarthritis management (p=0.22). However, 43% of rehabilitative professionals indicated that they had not been exposed to interprofessional education initiatives (p=0.61).

Conclusion: Both professions were well-versed on the roles of various professions involved in osteoarthritis management, however, communication was not optimal. While this study creates an awareness of the benefits of team-based management for osteoarthritis, the findings could stimulate debate on the optimal implementation of key competencies required for effective teamwork, thereby facilitating patient-focused care and referral systems.

骨关节炎管理的团队方法:南非生物动力学家和物理治疗师的观点
背景:骨关节炎治疗中生物动力学和物理治疗的康复性质突出了不同专业之间复杂的相互作用,以实现患者有效的结果。团队方法的成功取决于以患者为中心的最佳护理和适当的交叉转诊系统的关键能力。目的:探讨和描述生物动力学家和物理治疗师对南非公共和私人医疗机构骨关节炎管理团队方法的观点。方法:采用描述性方法和方便抽样技术。目标人群包括南非医疗保健部门的生物动力学家(n=47)和物理治疗师(n=165)。一份自我管理的在线问卷调查了康复专业人员对团队治疗骨关节炎的看法。结果:没有证据表明生物动力学家和物理治疗师在评估骨关节炎管理团队成员之间的沟通方面存在差异(p=0.68)。生物动力学家(43%)和物理治疗师(36%)认为沟通质量既不高也不低。生物动力学家(54%)和物理治疗师(69%)认为他们对各种医疗保健专业在骨关节炎管理中的作用有充分的了解(p=0.22)。然而,43%的康复专业人员表示他们没有接触过跨专业教育计划(p=0.61)。结论:两种职业对各职业在骨关节炎治疗中的作用都很了解,但沟通并不理想。虽然这项研究让人们意识到以团队为基础的骨关节炎管理的好处,但研究结果可能会引发关于有效团队合作所需关键能力的最佳实施的争论,从而促进以患者为中心的护理和转诊系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信