Affective Representation of Early Relationships with Parents and Current Anxiety and Depression

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
T. Tan, Yanhong Liu, Qiumei Zhang, Gengchun Li, Xiongying Chen, Jun Li
{"title":"Affective Representation of Early Relationships with Parents and Current Anxiety and Depression","authors":"T. Tan, Yanhong Liu, Qiumei Zhang, Gengchun Li, Xiongying Chen, Jun Li","doi":"10.1080/00221325.2022.2043231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research on the role of early relationships with parents on youth’s anxiety and depression, especially in collectivist societies such as China, is limited. To fill this gap, we investigated the unique role of early relationship with mothers and fathers, respectively, in Chinese youth’s anxiety and depression outcomes. The participants were 347 Chinese college students from 20 provinces. They first separately rated the frequency of experiencing 13 emotions (e.g., anger) from recalling early relationships with their mothers and fathers, then completed the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. Logistic regression was performed to determine the unique contribution of early relationships with mothers and fathers, respectively, to the participants’ clinical-level anxiety and depression. Based on the final model of our logistical regression, we found that an increase in negative affective representation of early relationship with the mother was associated with a higher likelihood of clinical level anxiety (OR = 3.58; 95% CI = 1.32–9.70), while an increase in positive affective representation of early relationship with the mother was associated with a lower likelihood of clinical-level depression (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.25–0.87). Furthermore, an increase in negative affective representation of early relationship with the father was associated with a higher likelihood of clinical-level anxiety (OR = 3.36; 95% CI = 1.37-8.26) and depression (OR = 3.68; 95% CI = 1.59-8.52), above and beyond their affective representation of early relationship with the mother.","PeriodicalId":54827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Psychology","volume":"183 1","pages":"235 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2022.2043231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research on the role of early relationships with parents on youth’s anxiety and depression, especially in collectivist societies such as China, is limited. To fill this gap, we investigated the unique role of early relationship with mothers and fathers, respectively, in Chinese youth’s anxiety and depression outcomes. The participants were 347 Chinese college students from 20 provinces. They first separately rated the frequency of experiencing 13 emotions (e.g., anger) from recalling early relationships with their mothers and fathers, then completed the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. Logistic regression was performed to determine the unique contribution of early relationships with mothers and fathers, respectively, to the participants’ clinical-level anxiety and depression. Based on the final model of our logistical regression, we found that an increase in negative affective representation of early relationship with the mother was associated with a higher likelihood of clinical level anxiety (OR = 3.58; 95% CI = 1.32–9.70), while an increase in positive affective representation of early relationship with the mother was associated with a lower likelihood of clinical-level depression (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.25–0.87). Furthermore, an increase in negative affective representation of early relationship with the father was associated with a higher likelihood of clinical-level anxiety (OR = 3.36; 95% CI = 1.37-8.26) and depression (OR = 3.68; 95% CI = 1.59-8.52), above and beyond their affective representation of early relationship with the mother.
早期与父母关系的情感表征与当前焦虑和抑郁
摘要关于早期与父母的关系对青少年焦虑和抑郁的影响的研究,特别是在中国这样的集体主义社会中,是有限的。为了填补这一空白,我们分别调查了早期与母亲和父亲的关系在中国青年焦虑和抑郁结果中的独特作用。参与者是来自20个省份的347名中国大学生。他们首先分别对回忆与父母早期关系中经历13种情绪(如愤怒)的频率进行评分,然后完成了Zung焦虑自评量表和Zung抑郁自评量量表。进行Logistic回归,以确定早期与母亲和父亲的关系分别对参与者临床水平焦虑和抑郁的独特贡献。基于我们的逻辑回归的最终模型,我们发现与母亲早期关系的负面情感表现的增加与临床水平焦虑的可能性更高有关(OR=3.58;95%CI=1.32-9.70),而与母亲早期关系的积极情感表现的增加与临床水平抑郁症的可能性较低有关(OR=0.47;95%CI=0.25-0.87)。此外,早期与父亲关系的负面情感表现的增加与临床水平焦虑(OR=3.36;95%CI=1.37-8.26)和抑郁(OR=3.68;95%CI=1.59-8.52)的可能性更高有关,高于或超过了早期与母亲关系的情感表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Psychology is devoted to research and theory in the field of developmental psychology. It encompasses a life-span approach, so in addition to manuscripts devoted to infancy, childhood, and adolescence, articles on adulthood and aging are also published. We accept submissions in the area of educational psychology as long as they are developmental in nature. Submissions in cross cultural psychology are accepted, but they must add to our understanding of human development in a comparative global context. Applied, descriptive, and qualitative articles are occasionally accepted, as are replications and refinements submitted as brief reports. The review process for all submissions to The Journal of Genetic Psychology consists of double blind review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信