Does Vocabulary Help Structure the Mind?

G. Lupyan, Martin Zettersten
{"title":"Does Vocabulary Help Structure the Mind?","authors":"G. Lupyan, Martin Zettersten","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/b74u9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does language reflect the categories of our mind or does it help create them? On one widespread view (cognitive priority), learning a language involves mapping words onto pre-existing categories, leaving little room for language to change the structure of conceptual content. On another view (linguistic priority), conceptual structure is shaped by experience with and use of language. We argue for the latter perspective and present experimental findings showing that nameability – the ease with which a feature can be named – influences problem-solving, category learning, and geometric reasoning. Even subtle manipulations affecting the availability of verbal labels can impact the categories people discover and use. Words do not simply reflect joints of nature, but are used to flexibly carve joints into nature.","PeriodicalId":44229,"journal":{"name":"Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b74u9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Does language reflect the categories of our mind or does it help create them? On one widespread view (cognitive priority), learning a language involves mapping words onto pre-existing categories, leaving little room for language to change the structure of conceptual content. On another view (linguistic priority), conceptual structure is shaped by experience with and use of language. We argue for the latter perspective and present experimental findings showing that nameability – the ease with which a feature can be named – influences problem-solving, category learning, and geometric reasoning. Even subtle manipulations affecting the availability of verbal labels can impact the categories people discover and use. Words do not simply reflect joints of nature, but are used to flexibly carve joints into nature.
词汇有助于构建思维吗?
语言是反映了我们的思维类别,还是有助于创造它们?从一个普遍的观点(认知优先)来看,学习一门语言需要将单词映射到预先存在的类别上,而语言几乎没有改变概念内容结构的空间。在另一种观点(语言优先)中,概念结构是由语言的经验和使用形成的。我们支持后一种观点,并提出了实验结果,表明命名能力——特征命名的容易程度——影响解决问题、类别学习和几何推理。即使是影响语言标签可用性的细微操作也会影响人们发现和使用的类别。文字不是简单地反映自然的关节,而是用来灵活地将关节雕刻成自然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology
Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信