Assessing disaster capitalism in post-disaster processes in Chile: neoliberal reforms and the role of the corporate class

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Vicente Sandoval, C. González-Muzzio, C. Villalobos, J. Sarmiento, Gabriela Hoberman
{"title":"Assessing disaster capitalism in post-disaster processes in Chile: neoliberal reforms and the role of the corporate class","authors":"Vicente Sandoval, C. González-Muzzio, C. Villalobos, J. Sarmiento, Gabriela Hoberman","doi":"10.1108/dpm-01-2020-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper examines disaster capitalism in Chile, that is, the relationships between disasters and neoliberalism. It looks at two post-disaster dimensions: disasters as windows of opportunity to introduce political reforms and disasters as occasions for the corporate class to capitalize on such disasters.Design/methodology/approachTwo indices, disaster capitalism (DC) and post-disaster private involvement (PDPI), are proposed for cross-case analysis. They are based on legal records, institutional reports and economic data. The DC assesses the introduction of reforms following disasters, while PDPI evaluates the share of public-private funding used for recovery. Both indices are applied here to two disasters in Chile: the 2010 Maule earthquake, and the 2008 Chaitén volcanic eruption.FindingsResults show that the highly neoliberal Chilean context leaves limited space for new neoliberal reforms. Although recovery is implemented predominantly through the private sector, the state still assumes greater responsibility for recovery costs. Results also detect poor levels of participation from the private sector in accounting their efforts and making them publicly available. Likewise, the research suggests that neoliberal reforms become more likely after disasters. However, the preexisting politico-economic context matters. Finally, there is clearly a need for data systematization in post-disaster recovery.Originality/valueIn the Chilean context, the indices proved beneficial as a strategy for data collection and a method for scrutinizing the implications of neoliberal policy implemented in the wake of disasters, as well as in evaluating the role of the corporate class during recovery.","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/dpm-01-2020-0005","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-01-2020-0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

PurposeThis paper examines disaster capitalism in Chile, that is, the relationships between disasters and neoliberalism. It looks at two post-disaster dimensions: disasters as windows of opportunity to introduce political reforms and disasters as occasions for the corporate class to capitalize on such disasters.Design/methodology/approachTwo indices, disaster capitalism (DC) and post-disaster private involvement (PDPI), are proposed for cross-case analysis. They are based on legal records, institutional reports and economic data. The DC assesses the introduction of reforms following disasters, while PDPI evaluates the share of public-private funding used for recovery. Both indices are applied here to two disasters in Chile: the 2010 Maule earthquake, and the 2008 Chaitén volcanic eruption.FindingsResults show that the highly neoliberal Chilean context leaves limited space for new neoliberal reforms. Although recovery is implemented predominantly through the private sector, the state still assumes greater responsibility for recovery costs. Results also detect poor levels of participation from the private sector in accounting their efforts and making them publicly available. Likewise, the research suggests that neoliberal reforms become more likely after disasters. However, the preexisting politico-economic context matters. Finally, there is clearly a need for data systematization in post-disaster recovery.Originality/valueIn the Chilean context, the indices proved beneficial as a strategy for data collection and a method for scrutinizing the implications of neoliberal policy implemented in the wake of disasters, as well as in evaluating the role of the corporate class during recovery.
评估智利灾后过程中的灾难资本主义:新自由主义改革和企业阶级的角色
本文考察智利的灾害资本主义,即灾害与新自由主义的关系。它着眼于灾后的两个维度:灾难是引入政治改革的机会之窗,灾难是企业阶级利用这些灾难的机会。设计/方法/方法两个指数,灾害资本主义(DC)和灾后私人参与(PDPI),提出了跨案例分析。它们基于法律记录、机构报告和经济数据。DC评估灾后改革的实施情况,而PDPI评估用于恢复的公私资金份额。这两个指数都应用于智利的两次灾害:2010年Maule地震和2008年chait火山爆发。研究结果表明,高度新自由主义的智利背景为新自由主义改革留下了有限的空间。尽管恢复主要是通过私营部门实施的,但国家在恢复成本方面仍承担着更大的责任。调查结果还发现,私营部门在对其努力进行核算和向公众提供这些成果方面的参与程度很低。同样,研究表明,灾难发生后,新自由主义改革的可能性更大。然而,先前存在的政治经济背景很重要。最后,灾后恢复显然需要数据系统化。在智利的情况下,这些指数被证明是一种有益的数据收集策略和一种审查灾难后实施的新自由主义政策的影响的方法,以及评估企业阶级在恢复期间的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信