Is perceptual learning generalisable in the chemical senses? A longitudinal pilot study based on a naturalistic blind wine tasting training scenario

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 Neuroscience
Qian Janice Wang, Henrique M. Fernandes, Alexander W. Fjaeldstad
{"title":"Is perceptual learning generalisable in the chemical senses? A longitudinal pilot study based on a naturalistic blind wine tasting training scenario","authors":"Qian Janice Wang,&nbsp;Henrique M. Fernandes,&nbsp;Alexander W. Fjaeldstad","doi":"10.1007/s12078-020-09284-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A growing body of research has demonstrated differences in perceptual, conceptual, and language abilities between wine experts and novices. However, it is unclear to what extent these differences are innate or acquired through training. The present study assessed the olfactory and gustatory performance of a group of university blind wine tasters before and after training. Previous research has shown that this training regimen significantly improves blind tasting accuracy, but it remains unknown whether perceptual learning from blind tasting training is generalisable to standard tests of olfactory/gustatory ability.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two testing sessions were carried out for the training group (<i>N</i> = 14) as well as for a control group (<i>N</i> = 12) before and after a 5-week training period. In each session, participants underwent olfactory threshold, discrimination, and identification assessments as well as a gustatory sensitivity test.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Olfactory discrimination significantly improved in the training group over the 5-week period, and the training group outperformed controls in olfactory identification in both sessions.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on our limited set of data, wine training seems to have improved olfactory discrimination, even though the method of training did not involve odorants used in the discrimination test itself.</p><h3>Implications</h3><p>These results reveal that even wine training over a short period seems to make concrete changes to olfactory performance, supporting the idea that generalised perceptual learning can take place for odour discrimination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":516,"journal":{"name":"Chemosensory Perception","volume":"14 2","pages":"64 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-020-09284-x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosensory Perception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-020-09284-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction

A growing body of research has demonstrated differences in perceptual, conceptual, and language abilities between wine experts and novices. However, it is unclear to what extent these differences are innate or acquired through training. The present study assessed the olfactory and gustatory performance of a group of university blind wine tasters before and after training. Previous research has shown that this training regimen significantly improves blind tasting accuracy, but it remains unknown whether perceptual learning from blind tasting training is generalisable to standard tests of olfactory/gustatory ability.

Methods

Two testing sessions were carried out for the training group (N = 14) as well as for a control group (N = 12) before and after a 5-week training period. In each session, participants underwent olfactory threshold, discrimination, and identification assessments as well as a gustatory sensitivity test.

Results

Olfactory discrimination significantly improved in the training group over the 5-week period, and the training group outperformed controls in olfactory identification in both sessions.

Conclusions

Based on our limited set of data, wine training seems to have improved olfactory discrimination, even though the method of training did not involve odorants used in the discrimination test itself.

Implications

These results reveal that even wine training over a short period seems to make concrete changes to olfactory performance, supporting the idea that generalised perceptual learning can take place for odour discrimination.

Abstract Image

知觉学习在化学感官中是可推广的吗?基于自然盲品酒训练场景的纵向先导研究
越来越多的研究表明,葡萄酒专家和新手在感知、概念和语言能力方面存在差异。然而,目前尚不清楚这些差异在多大程度上是天生的还是通过训练获得的。本研究评估了一组大学盲人品酒师在训练前后的嗅觉和味觉表现。先前的研究表明,这种训练方案显著提高了盲品的准确性,但尚不清楚盲品训练的感知学习是否适用于嗅觉/味觉能力的标准测试。方法在5周的训练前后,对训练组(N = 14)和对照组(N = 12)进行2次测试。在每次会议中,参与者进行嗅觉阈值,辨别和识别评估以及味觉敏感性测试。结果经过5周的训练,训练组的嗅觉识别能力显著提高,两组的嗅觉识别能力均优于对照组。根据我们有限的数据集,葡萄酒训练似乎提高了嗅觉辨别,即使训练方法不涉及辨别测试本身使用的气味。这些结果表明,即使是短期的葡萄酒训练似乎也会对嗅觉表现产生具体的变化,这支持了广义感知学习可以发生在气味辨别方面的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemosensory Perception
Chemosensory Perception 农林科学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coverage in Chemosensory Perception includes animal work with implications for human phenomena and explores the following areas: Identification of chemicals producing sensory response; Identification of sensory response associated with chemicals; Human in vivo response to chemical stimuli; Human in vitro response to chemical stimuli; Neuroimaging of chemosensory function; Neurological processing of chemoreception; Chemoreception mechanisms; Psychophysics of chemoperception; Trigeminal function; Multisensory perception; Contextual effect on chemoperception; Behavioral response to chemical stimuli; Physiological factors affecting and contributing to chemoperception; Flavor and hedonics; Memory and chemoperception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信