Biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia: Current landscape and future directions

Q2 Medicine
Abbott Gifford , Nathan Praschan , Amy Newhouse , Zeina Chemali
{"title":"Biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia: Current landscape and future directions","authors":"Abbott Gifford ,&nbsp;Nathan Praschan ,&nbsp;Amy Newhouse ,&nbsp;Zeina Chemali","doi":"10.1016/j.bionps.2023.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, encompassing a myriad of different, clinically distinct subtypes which all target the frontoinsular region. FTD is characterized by a decline in behavioral, language, and executive functions. Due to its proximity to similar diseases, both in symptomology and mechanism, FTD remains challenging to diagnose conclusively. As a result, searching for distinct biomarkers that allow clinicians to differentiate between FTD and other neurocognitive disorders is extremely important. This review examines studies published in the past decade to evaluate which current biomarkers are the most clinically viable and where future research might lead. Genetic screening for FTD, specifically the three most common mutations to the TDP-43, MAPT, and PGRN genes, show promising predictive ability and could help patients access treatment in the early stages of the disease. In addition, serum and CSF biomarkers can help clinicians track the disease process and show good specificity when differentiating between FTD, primary psychiatric disorders, and other neurodegenerative diseases, especially when coupled with imaging techniques such as MRI and PET. Lastly, recent advances in machine learning may allow future researchers and clinicians to comprehensively analyze FTD's biochemical and imaging fingerprint, leading to increasingly accurate and timely diagnosis. Further work must be focused on transitioning the understanding of FTD biomarkers from research to concrete tools available to clinicians and patients, with the hopes of advancing the quality of care available to those suffering from FTD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52767,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666144623000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, encompassing a myriad of different, clinically distinct subtypes which all target the frontoinsular region. FTD is characterized by a decline in behavioral, language, and executive functions. Due to its proximity to similar diseases, both in symptomology and mechanism, FTD remains challenging to diagnose conclusively. As a result, searching for distinct biomarkers that allow clinicians to differentiate between FTD and other neurocognitive disorders is extremely important. This review examines studies published in the past decade to evaluate which current biomarkers are the most clinically viable and where future research might lead. Genetic screening for FTD, specifically the three most common mutations to the TDP-43, MAPT, and PGRN genes, show promising predictive ability and could help patients access treatment in the early stages of the disease. In addition, serum and CSF biomarkers can help clinicians track the disease process and show good specificity when differentiating between FTD, primary psychiatric disorders, and other neurodegenerative diseases, especially when coupled with imaging techniques such as MRI and PET. Lastly, recent advances in machine learning may allow future researchers and clinicians to comprehensively analyze FTD's biochemical and imaging fingerprint, leading to increasingly accurate and timely diagnosis. Further work must be focused on transitioning the understanding of FTD biomarkers from research to concrete tools available to clinicians and patients, with the hopes of advancing the quality of care available to those suffering from FTD.

额颞叶痴呆的生物标志物:现状和未来方向
额颞叶痴呆(FTD)是最常见的神经退行性疾病之一,包括无数不同的、临床上不同的亚型,这些亚型都针对额颞叶区域。FTD的特点是行为、语言和执行功能的下降。由于其在症状和机制上与类似疾病相似,FTD的最终诊断仍然具有挑战性。因此,寻找不同的生物标志物,使临床医生能够区分FTD和其他神经认知障碍是极其重要的。这篇综述考察了过去十年中发表的研究,以评估当前哪些生物标志物在临床上最可行,以及未来的研究可能会走向何方。FTD的基因筛查,特别是TDP-43、MAPT和PGRN基因的三种最常见突变,显示出有希望的预测能力,可以帮助患者在疾病早期获得治疗。此外,血清和CSF生物标志物可以帮助临床医生跟踪疾病过程,并在区分FTD、原发性精神疾病和其他神经退行性疾病时显示出良好的特异性,尤其是与MRI和PET等成像技术相结合时。最后,机器学习的最新进展可能使未来的研究人员和临床医生能够全面分析FTD的生化和成像指纹,从而实现越来越准确和及时的诊断。进一步的工作必须集中在将对FTD生物标志物的理解从研究转移到临床医生和患者可用的具体工具上,以期提高FTD患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信